Differences between Continuous and Discrete Contingent Value Estimates

Article Properties
  • DOI (url)
  • Publication Date
    1996/08/01
  • Journal
  • Indian UGC (journal)
  • Citations
    118
  • Richard C. Ready
  • Jean C. Buzby
  • Dayuan Hu
Cite
Ready, Richard C., et al. “Differences Between Continuous and Discrete Contingent Value Estimates”. Land Economics, vol. 72, no. 3, 1996, p. 397, https://doi.org/10.2307/3147205.
Ready, R. C., Buzby, J. C., & Hu, D. (1996). Differences between Continuous and Discrete Contingent Value Estimates. Land Economics, 72(3), 397. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147205
Ready RC, Buzby JC, Hu D. Differences between Continuous and Discrete Contingent Value Estimates. Land Economics. 1996;72(3):397.
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Valuing insurance against small probability risks: A meta-analysis Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
2024
Households’ willingness-to-pay for mangrove environmental services: Evidence from Phu Long, Northeast Vietnam Trees, Forests and People 2024
Global fertilizer crisis and willingness to pay for chemical fertilizers: empirical evidence from Nepal

Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies
  • Agriculture: Agriculture (General)
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
2024
Survey of Residents of Historic Cities Willingness to Pay for a Cultural Heritage Conservation Project: The Contribution of Heritage Awareness

Land
  • Agriculture
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Social Sciences
2023
Regional Differences in Willingness to Pay for Mitigation of Air Pollution from Coal-Fired Power Plants in South Korea

Sustainability
  • Technology: Mechanical engineering and machinery: Renewable energy sources
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Technology: Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
  • Science: Biology (General): Ecology
2023
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science64
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business51
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences49
Technology: Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering36
Science: Biology (General): Ecology34
Agriculture: Agriculture (General)16
Medicine: Public aspects of medicine16
Social Sciences15
Medicine: Medicine (General): Medical technology14
Agriculture: Plant culture13
Agriculture: Forestry7
Technology: Mechanical engineering and machinery: Renewable energy sources7
Technology: Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)6
Science: Botany: Plant ecology6
Technology: Home economics: Nutrition. Foods and food supply5
Agriculture5
Technology: Hydraulic engineering: River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)5
Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor: Management. Industrial management5
Technology: Chemical technology: Food processing and manufacture4
Social Sciences: Transportation and communications4
Agriculture: Animal culture3
Science: Science (General)3
Social Sciences: Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform3
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Human ecology. Anthropogeography: Settlements: Cities. Urban geography3
Social Sciences: Communities. Classes. Races: Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology3
Medicine: Medicine (General)3
Technology: Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General): Transportation engineering3
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business: Personnel management. Employment management2
Science: Geology2
Medicine2
Science2
Technology: Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General): Environmental engineering2
Medicine: Internal medicine: Special situations and conditions: Industrial medicine. Industrial hygiene2
Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor: Special industries and trades: Energy industries. Energy policy. Fuel trade2
Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor2
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Oceanography2
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology2
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)2
Medicine: Medicine (General): Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics2
Medicine: Public aspects of medicine: Toxicology. Poisons1
Medicine: Internal medicine: Specialties of internal medicine: Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology1
Medicine: Pediatrics1
Social Sciences: Sociology (General)1
Social Sciences: Finance1
Science: Biology (General)1
Agriculture: Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling1
Medicine: Internal medicine: Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry: Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system: Psychiatry1
Social Sciences: Communities. Classes. Races: Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology: City planning1
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Recreation. Leisure: Sports1
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business: Business communication. Including business report writing, business correspondence1
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business: Marketing. Distribution of products1
Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor: Economic growth, development, planning1
The category Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science 64 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Measuring Consumer Benefits of Food Safety Risk Reductions and was published in 1998. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled Global fertilizer crisis and willingness to pay for chemical fertilizers: empirical evidence from Nepal. This article reached its peak citation in 2019, with 8 citations. It has been cited in 72 different journals, 9% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Ecological Economics cited this research the most, with 11 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year