WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates
Article Properties
-
LanguageEnglish
-
DOI (url)
-
Publication Date2015/07/22
-
Indian UGC (journal)
-
Refrences15
-
Citations553
-
AP Betran UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO, World Bank Special Programme of Research Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction Department of Reproductive Health and Research World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland
-
MR Torloni Brazilian Cochrane Center and Department of Obstetrics São Paulo School of Medicine São Paulo Federal University São Paulo Brazil
-
JJ Zhang Ministry of Education–Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health Xinhua Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
-
AM Gülmezoglu UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO, World Bank Special Programme of Research Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction Department of Reproductive Health and Research World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland
-
Cite
Betran, AP, et al. “WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates”. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &Amp; Gynaecology, vol. 123, no. 5, 2015, pp. 667-70, https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13526.
Betran, A., Torloni, M., Zhang, J., & Gülmezoglu, A. (2015). WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &Amp; Gynaecology, 123(5), 667-670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13526
Betran, AP, MR Torloni, JJ Zhang, and AM Gülmezoglu. “WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates”. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &Amp; Gynaecology 123, no. 5 (2015): 667-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13526.
Betran A, Torloni M, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu A. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2015;123(5):667-70.
Journal Categories
Medicine
Medicine
Gynecology and obstetrics
Medicine
Medicine (General)
You May Also Like
- Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium
- Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum
- FIGO classification system (PALM‐COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age
- Menstrual Blood Loss–A Population Study
- Maternal and perinatal outcomes with COVID‐19: A systematic review of 108 pregnancies
Refrences
| Title | Journal | Journal Categories | Citations | Publication Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non‐clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section | 2011 | |||
| Appropriate technology for birth | 1985 | |||
| WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates | 2015 | |||
| China's 50% caesarean delivery rate: is it too high? | BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology |
| 90 | 2014 |
| Obstetricians' choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation? | American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology |
| 71 | 2009 |
Citations
Citations Analysis
The category
Medicine: Medicine (General) 308
is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Assessing the performance of maternity care in Europe: a critical exploration of tools and indicators and was published in 2015. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled Pre-pregnancy body mass index and caesarean section in Andean women in Peru: a prospective cohort study. This article reached its peak citation in 2020, with 116 citations. It has been cited in 252 different journals, 38% of which are open access. Among related journals, the BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth cited this research the most, with 58 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.