Destruction of public and governmental experiments of GMO in Europe

Article Properties
Cite
Kuntz, Marcel. “Destruction of Public and Governmental Experiments of GMO in Europe”. GM Crops &Amp; Food, vol. 3, no. 4, 2012, pp. 258-64, https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.21231.
Kuntz, M. (2012). Destruction of public and governmental experiments of GMO in Europe. GM Crops &Amp; Food, 3(4), 258-264. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.21231
Kuntz M. Destruction of public and governmental experiments of GMO in Europe. GM Crops & Food. 2012;3(4):258-64.
Journal Categories
Agriculture
Agriculture
Agriculture (General)
Agriculture
Plant culture
Science
Biology (General)
Genetics
Science
Botany
Plant ecology
Technology
Chemical technology
Biotechnology
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Ministers back gene-crop advisers Nature
  • Science: Science (General)
2 2003
Is the German suspension of MON810 maize cultivation scientifically justified? Transgenic Research
  • Science: Chemistry: Organic chemistry: Biochemistry
  • Science: Biology (General)
  • Technology: Chemical technology: Biotechnology
  • Science: Biology (General): Genetics
57 2009
German GM research—a personal account Nature Biotechnology
  • Technology: Chemical technology: Biotechnology
  • Science: Microbiology
  • Science: Biology (General)
  • Science: Chemistry: Organic chemistry: Biochemistry
5 2009
The new fundamentalism Nature Biotechnology
  • Technology: Chemical technology: Biotechnology
  • Science: Microbiology
  • Science: Biology (General)
  • Science: Chemistry: Organic chemistry: Biochemistry
6 2005
Government regulation and public opposition create high additional costs for field trials with GM crops in Switzerland Transgenic Research
  • Science: Chemistry: Organic chemistry: Biochemistry
  • Science: Biology (General)
  • Technology: Chemical technology: Biotechnology
  • Science: Biology (General): Genetics
7 2011
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Biosafety regulatory frameworks in Kenya, Nigeria, Uganda and Sweden and their potential impact on international R&D collaborations GM Crops & Food
  • Agriculture: Plant culture
  • Science: Biology (General): Genetics
  • Technology: Chemical technology: Biotechnology
  • Science: Botany: Plant ecology
  • Agriculture: Plant culture
  • Agriculture
  • Agriculture: Agriculture (General)
3 2023
Possible EU futures for CRISPR-edited plants: Little margin for optimism?

Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Agriculture: Plant culture
  • Agriculture: Plant culture
  • Agriculture: Animal culture
  • Science: Botany: Plant ecology
2 2023
Red in tooth and claw: A review of animal antagonistic roles in movies

People and Nature
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Human ecology. Anthropogeography
  • Science: Biology (General): Ecology
  • Science: Biology (General): Ecology
  • Science: Biology (General): Ecology
  • Technology: Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
  • Science: Biology (General): Ecology
2 2022
Ecologies of contention: how more-than-human natures shape contentious actions and politics The Journal of Peasant Studies
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Anthropology
  • Social Sciences: Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
  • Social Sciences
2 2022
Uniformity, Experimentalism, and the Unfulfilled Promise of Differentiated Integration in EU Regulation of GMOs: Which Way Forward? SSRN Electronic Journal 2022
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Agriculture: Plant culture11
Science: Botany: Plant ecology11
Technology: Chemical technology: Biotechnology11
Science: Biology (General)10
Science: Chemistry: Organic chemistry: Biochemistry7
Science: Biology (General): Genetics7
Agriculture7
Agriculture: Agriculture (General)7
Agriculture: Animal culture5
Social Sciences4
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences3
Science: Microbiology3
Science: Biology (General): Cytology2
Technology: Mechanical engineering and machinery: Renewable energy sources2
Technology: Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering2
Science: Biology (General): Ecology2
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business1
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business: Personnel management. Employment management1
Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science1
Technology: Chemical technology: Food processing and manufacture1
Technology: Home economics: Nutrition. Foods and food supply1
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Anthropology1
Social Sciences: Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform1
Medicine: Internal medicine: Special situations and conditions: Industrial medicine. Industrial hygiene1
Medicine: Internal medicine: Infectious and parasitic diseases1
Medicine: Internal medicine: Special situations and conditions: Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine1
Medicine: Public aspects of medicine1
Medicine: Medicine (General)1
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation1
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)1
Political science1
Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media1
The category Agriculture: Plant culture 11 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Symbolic Communication in Public Protest Over Genetic Modification and was published in 2012. The most recent citation comes from a 2023 study titled Biosafety regulatory frameworks in Kenya, Nigeria, Uganda and Sweden and their potential impact on international R&D collaborations. This article reached its peak citation in 2022, with 4 citations. It has been cited in 24 different journals, 16% of which are open access. Among related journals, the GM Crops & Food cited this research the most, with 5 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year