Consent Documents for Oncology Trials: Does Anybody Read These Things?
Article Properties
-
LanguageEnglish
-
DOI (url)
-
Publication Date2004/12/01
-
Indian UGC (journal)
-
Refrences21
-
Citations96
-
S Michael Sharp
Cite
Sharp, S Michael. “Consent Documents for Oncology Trials: Does Anybody Read These Things?”. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 6, 2004, pp. 570-5, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.coc.0000135925.83221.b3.
Sharp, S. M. (2004). Consent Documents for Oncology Trials: Does Anybody Read These Things?. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(6), 570-575. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.coc.0000135925.83221.b3
Sharp SM. Consent Documents for Oncology Trials: Does Anybody Read These Things?. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004;27(6):570-5.
Journal Categories
Medicine
Internal medicine
Neoplasms
Tumors
Oncology
Including cancer and carcinogens
Medicine
Medicine (General)
You May Also Like
- Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
- NCCN Task Force Report: Update on the Management of Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
- Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer
Refrences
| Title | Journal | Journal Categories | Citations | Publication Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1056/NEJMsa021212 | New England Journal of Medicine |
| 2003 | |
| 10.1016/S0197-2456(03)00003-5 | 2003 | |||
| 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.10.2211 | 1994 | |||
| Institutional Review Board (IRB) Review Lacks Impact on the Readability of Consent Forms for Research | The American Journal of the Medical Sciences |
| 45 | 1992 |
| Are Research Participants Truly Informed? Readability of Informed Consent Forms Used in Research | Ethics & Behavior |
| 62 | 1991 |
Refrences Analysis
| Category | Category Repetition |
|---|---|
| Medicine: Medicine (General) | 8 |
| Medicine: Internal medicine | 2 |
| Medicine: Pediatrics | 1 |
The category
Medicine: Medicine (General) 8
is the most frequently represented among the references in this article. It primarily includes studies from Pediatrics and The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. The chart below illustrates the number of referenced publications per year.
Refrences used by this article by year
Citations
| Title | Journal | Journal Categories | Citations | Publication Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Evaluating the impact of a SIMPlified LaYered consent process on recruitment of potential participants to theStaphylococcus aureusNetwork Adaptive Platform trial: study protocol for a multicentre pragmatic nested randomised clinical trial (SIMPLY-SNAP trial) | BMJ Open |
| 2024 | |
Leveraging artificial intelligence to detect ethical concerns in medical research: a case study | Journal of Medical Ethics |
| 2024 | |
| Creation of a risk of harms informed consent form for dry needling: A nominal group technique | Musculoskeletal Science and Practice |
| 2023 | |
uConsent: Addressing the gap in measuring understanding of informed consent in clinical research | Clinical and Translational Science |
| 2023 | |
Regulatory compliance and readability of informed consent forms in industry-sponsored drug development clinical trials | Clinical Trials |
| 2023 |
Citations Analysis
The category
Medicine: Medicine (General) 44
is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Issues, both ethical and practical, in the development and conduct of chemoprevention trials and was published in 2004. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled Leveraging artificial intelligence to detect ethical concerns in medical research: a case study. This article reached its peak citation in 2016, with 9 citations. It has been cited in 72 different journals, 15% of which are open access. Among related journals, the PLOS ONE cited this research the most, with 9 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.