Human resource management in the knowledge age

Article Properties
Abstract
Cite
Despres, Charles, and Jean‐Marie Hiltrop. “Human Resource Management in the Knowledge Age”. Employee Relations, vol. 17, no. 1, 1995, pp. 9-23, https://doi.org/10.1108/01425459510146652.
Despres, C., & Hiltrop, J. (1995). Human resource management in the knowledge age. Employee Relations, 17(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425459510146652
Despres C, Hiltrop J. Human resource management in the knowledge age. Employee Relations. 1995;17(1):9-23.
Journal Categories
Social Sciences
Commerce
Business
Social Sciences
Commerce
Business
Personnel management
Employment management
Social Sciences
Economic theory
Demography
Economics as a science
Social Sciences
Industries
Land use
Labor
Labor
Work
Working class
Labor market
Labor supply
Labor demand
Description

Reimagining HRM for the knowledge-driven organization: This paper explores the challenges and opportunities that the knowledge age presents for human resource management (HRM). With knowledge becoming an increasingly vital resource, contemporary businesses must adapt their HRM practices to effectively manage knowledge workers. The research draws upon diverse theories, research, and practical insights to develop a deeper understanding of these issues, particularly within knowledge-intensive organizations. It underscores the difficulties in transitioning from traditional HRM models to post-industrial approaches. A critical review of traditional compensation systems provides a basis for proposing preferred practices in this crucial area. Ultimately, the paper argues that managers in knowledge-intensive organizations face new complexities in coordinating and directing the efforts of knowledge workers. Existing compensation structures and routines must be re-evaluated to foster a more engaged and productive workforce in this evolving landscape.

Published in Employee Relations, this article discusses the major contention is that the managers of knowledge‐intensive organizations are confronting major new issues in co‐ordinating and directing the effort of knowledge workers. The major conclusion is that existing compensation structures and routines must be re‐thought and makes several suggestions in this regard.

Refrences
Citations
Citations Analysis
The first research to cite this article was titled Knowledge work or working knowledge? Ambiguity and confusion in the analysis of the “knowledge age” and was published in 1997. The most recent citation comes from a 2022 study titled Knowledge work or working knowledge? Ambiguity and confusion in the analysis of the “knowledge age” . This article reached its peak citation in 2013 , with 6 citations.It has been cited in 52 different journals, 5% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Journal of Knowledge Management cited this research the most, with 5 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year