INPUT, INTAKE, AND RETENTION

Article Properties
Abstract
Cite
Watanabe, Yuichi. “INPUT, INTAKE, AND RETENTION”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 19, no. 3, 1997, pp. 287-0, https://doi.org/10.1017/s027226319700301x.
Watanabe, Y. (1997). INPUT, INTAKE, AND RETENTION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(3), 287-307. https://doi.org/10.1017/s027226319700301x
Watanabe Y. INPUT, INTAKE, AND RETENTION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1997;19(3):287-30.
Journal Categories
Language and Literature
Philology
Linguistics
Language and Literature
Philology
Linguistics
Communication
Mass media
Social Sciences
Description

How do different learning cues affect vocabulary acquisition? This study explores the impact of text modification and task type on incidental vocabulary learning in a foreign language. The research investigates how various cue types (appositives, single and multiple-choice marginal glosses) and a task (translation) influence processing, initial learning, and retention of target words in a text. Students in Japanese universities were randomly assigned to 10 condition groups, were given a reading task, and a cloze test. After a pretest, they were given a surprise vocabulary test. A week later, two unexpected delayed posttests were also given. (a) both single and multiple-choice marginal gloss conditions performed significantly better than the no cue and the appositive conditions, (b) no statistically significant difference existed between the single and the multiple-choice gloss conditions nor between the appositive and the no cue conditions, and (c) the translation task had no effect. The study's results offer valuable insights for language teachers and curriculum designers seeking to optimize vocabulary acquisition through reading activities. The paper is designed to analyze dynamic changes in autonomic tone preceding the onset of PAF in a large group of patients.

Citations
Citations Analysis
The first research to cite this article was titled Cognitive Load Framework: An Alternative to The Involvement Load Hypothesis and was published in 2021. The most recent citation comes from a 2022 study titled Cognitive Load Framework: An Alternative to The Involvement Load Hypothesis . This article reached its peak citation in 2022 , with 2 citations.It has been cited in 3 different journals. Among related journals, the Mobile Information Systems cited this research the most, with 1 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year