Improving reporting of adverse drug reactions: Systematic review
Article Properties
-
LanguageEnglish
-
DOI (url)
-
Publication Date2009/05/01
-
Journal
-
Indian UGC (journal)
-
Citations3
-
Mariam Molokhia
Cite
Molokhia, Mariam. “Improving Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions: Systematic Review”. Clinical Epidemiology, 2009, p. 75, https://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s4775.
Molokhia, M. (2009). Improving reporting of adverse drug reactions: Systematic review. Clinical Epidemiology, 75. https://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s4775
Molokhia M. Improving reporting of adverse drug reactions: Systematic review. Clinical Epidemiology. 2009;:75.
Journal Categories
Medicine
Internal medicine
Infectious and parasitic diseases
Medicine
Internal medicine
Special situations and conditions
Industrial medicine
Industrial hygiene
Medicine
Medicine (General)
Medicine
Public aspects of medicine
Citations
| Title | Journal | Journal Categories | Citations | Publication Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
The Utility of Different Data Standards to Document Adverse Drug Event Symptoms and Diagnoses: Mixed Methods Study | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| 3 | 2021 |
| The Risks and Outcomes Resulting From Medication Errors Reported in the Finnish Tertiary Care Units: | Frontiers in Pharmacology |
| 8 | 2020 |
Relationship between mirtazapine dose and incidence of adrenergic side effects: An exploratory analysis | Mental Health Clinician |
| 8 | 2019 |
Citations Analysis
The category
Medicine: Medicine (General): Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics 1
is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Relationship between mirtazapine dose and incidence of adrenergic side effects: An exploratory analysis and was published in 2019. The most recent citation comes from a 2021 study titled The Utility of Different Data Standards to Document Adverse Drug Event Symptoms and Diagnoses: Mixed Methods Study. This article reached its peak citation in 2021, with 1 citations. It has been cited in 3 different journals, 100% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Journal of Medical Internet Research cited this research the most, with 1 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.