Conceptualizing the (Dis)unity of Science∗

Article Properties
Abstract
Cite
Grantham, Todd A. “Conceptualizing the (Dis)unity of Science∗”. Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, no. 2, 2004, pp. 133-55, https://doi.org/10.1086/383008.
Grantham, T. A. (2004). Conceptualizing the (Dis)unity of Science∗. Philosophy of Science, 71(2), 133-155. https://doi.org/10.1086/383008
Grantham, Todd A. “Conceptualizing the (Dis)unity of Science∗”. Philosophy of Science 71, no. 2 (2004): 133-55. https://doi.org/10.1086/383008.
Grantham TA. Conceptualizing the (Dis)unity of Science∗. Philosophy of Science. 2004;71(2):133-55.
Journal Categories
Philosophy
Psychology
Religion
Philosophy (General)
Social Sciences
You May Also Like
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
The Earliest Known Eutherian Mammal 2002
The Failure of Reduction and How to Resist the Disunity of the Sciences in the Context of Chemical Education 2000
Reconstructing Phylogeny With and Without Temporal Data 1999
Evolutionary and Preservational Constraints on Origins of Biologic Groups: Divergence Times of Eutherian Mammals 1999
Rethinking Unity as a Working Hypothesis: How Archaeologists Exploit the Disunities of Science 1999
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Promises and Perils of Big Data: Philosophical Constraints on Chemical Ontologies Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • Science: Chemistry: General. Including alchemy
  • Science: Chemistry: Analytical chemistry
  • Science: Chemistry
 2024
The reductionism of genopolitics in the context of the relationships between biology and political science Endeavour
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
  • Science: Science (General)
  • Social Sciences
 2023
Challenging the Mechanistic View of Integration in Psychiatry The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
  • Social Sciences
 2023
Who’s afraid of nutritionism? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
  • Social Sciences
 2023
Unified and pluralistic ideals for data sharing and reuse in biodiversity

 Database
  • Medicine: Medicine (General): Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
  • Science: Biology (General)
  • Medicine: Medicine (General): Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics
  • Science: Biology (General)
  • Science: Biology (General)
  • Science: Chemistry: Organic chemistry: Biochemistry
 2023
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)29
Social Sciences24
Social Sciences: Sociology (General)7
History (General) and history of Europe: History (General)7
Science: Biology (General)2
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences2
Technology: Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering2
Science: Biology (General): Ecology2
Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science2
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business2
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics2
Science: Chemistry: General. Including alchemy1
Science: Chemistry: Analytical chemistry1
Science: Chemistry1
Medicine: Medicine (General): Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics1
Science: Chemistry: Organic chemistry: Biochemistry1
Technology: Mechanical engineering and machinery: Renewable energy sources1
Education: Theory and practice of education1
Education1
Science: Science (General)1
Social Sciences: Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform1
Medicine: Public aspects of medicine1
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology1
The category Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General) 29 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled The role of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction: Why is it so difficult to integrate paleobiological and neontological evolutionary biology? and was published in 2004. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled Promises and Perils of Big Data: Philosophical Constraints on Chemical Ontologies. This article reached its peak citation in 2022, with 6 citations. It has been cited in 24 different journals, 8% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences cited this research the most, with 6 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year