The boundaries of a deliberative system: the case of disruptive protest

Article Properties
Cite
Smith, William. “The Boundaries of a Deliberative System: The Case of Disruptive Protest”. Critical Policy Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, 2016, pp. 152-70, https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1165128.
Smith, W. (2016). The boundaries of a deliberative system: the case of disruptive protest. Critical Policy Studies, 10(2), 152-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1165128
Smith, William. “The Boundaries of a Deliberative System: The Case of Disruptive Protest”. Critical Policy Studies 10, no. 2 (2016): 152-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1165128.
Smith W. The boundaries of a deliberative system: the case of disruptive protest. Critical Policy Studies. 2016;10(2):152-70.
Journal Categories
Political science
Political science
Political institutions and public administration (General)
Social Sciences
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
10.1525/9780520956995 2013
The Yale Law Journal 2005
10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001 1996
The Good Polity 1989
Articulating Dissent: Protest and the Public Sphere 2014
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems

 European Political Science Review
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Political science
  • Social Sciences
 2024
Reflective Inclusion: Learning from Activists What Taking a Deliberative Stance Means

 Political Studies
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Political science
  • Social Sciences
 2023
Symmetry and interpretation: a deliberative framework for judging recognition claims Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
  • Political science
 1 2022
Listening to the Public: An Inductive Analysis of the Good Citizen in a Deliberative System

 Journal of Deliberative Democracy
  • Political science: Political theory
 2022
Learning from Democratic Practices: New Perspectives in Institutional Design The Journal of Politics
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Political science
  • Social Sciences
 10 2021
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Political science15
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)12
Social Sciences12
Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media2
Political science: International relations1
Political science: Political theory1
The category Political science 15 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Non-deliberative politics in deliberative democracy: distinct approaches for different actors and was published in 2017. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems. This article reached its peak citation in 2020, with 5 citations. It has been cited in 14 different journals, 14% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Political Studies cited this research the most, with 3 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year