Assessment of Regional Treatment Effect in a Multiregional Clinical Trial
Article Properties
-
LanguageEnglish
-
DOI (url)
-
Publication Date2012/09/01
-
Indian UGC (journal)
-
Refrences7
-
Citations17
-
Yi Tsong a Office of Biostatistics, CDER , U.S. Food and Drug Administration , Silver Spring , Maryland , USA
-
Wan-Jung Chang b Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics , Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes , Zhunan Town , Miaoli County , Taiwan
-
Xiaoyu Dong c University of Maryland at Baltimore County , Baltimore , Maryland , USA
-
Hsiao-Hui Tsou b Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics , Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes , Zhunan Town , Miaoli County , Taiwan
Cite
Tsong, Yi, et al. “Assessment of Regional Treatment Effect in a Multiregional Clinical Trial”. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, vol. 22, no. 5, 2012, pp. 1019-36, https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2012.701583.
Tsong, Y., Chang, W.-J., Dong, X., & Tsou, H.-H. (2012). Assessment of Regional Treatment Effect in a Multiregional Clinical Trial. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 22(5), 1019-1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2012.701583
Tsong Y, Chang WJ, Dong X, Tsou HH. Assessment of Regional Treatment Effect in a Multiregional Clinical Trial. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics. 2012;22(5):1019-36.
Journal Categories
Medicine
Public aspects of medicine
Toxicology
Poisons
Medicine
Therapeutics
Pharmacology
Science
Mathematics
Probabilities
Mathematical statistics
You May Also Like
- Optimal caliper widths for propensity‐score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies
- Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study
- Guidelines for accurate EC50/IC50 estimation
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
- Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice
Refrences
| Title | Journal | Journal Categories | Citations | Publication Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample size considerations for Japanese patients in a multi‐regional trial based on MHLW guidance | Pharmaceutical Statistics |
| 67 | 2010 |
| Sample size considerations for Japanese patients in a multi‐regional trial based on MHLW guidance | 1998 | |||
| Successful bridging strategy based on ICH E5 guideline for drugs approved in Japan | Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics |
| 44 | 2005 |
| Sample Size Allocation to Regions in a Multiregional Trial | Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics |
| 49 | 2009 |
| Sample Size Determination for a Specific Region in a Multiregional Trial | Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics |
| 35 | 2010 |
Citations
| Title | Journal | Journal Categories | Citations | Publication Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bayesian approach for design and analysis of medical device trials in the era of modern clinical studies | Medical Review |
| 2023 | |
| Hierarchical Generalized Linear Models for Multiregional Clinical Trials | Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research |
| 3 | 2021 |
Bayesian multiregional clinical trials using model averaging | Biostatistics |
| 2021 | |
Regional consistency and sample size considerations in a multiregional equivalence trial | Pharmaceutical Statistics |
| 2020 | |
| Semi-parametric Bayesian regression for subgroup analysis in clinical trials | Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics |
| 1 | 2019 |
Citations Analysis
The category
Science: Mathematics: Probabilities. Mathematical statistics 14
is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Statistical Considerations on Design and Analysis of Bridging and Multiregional Clinical Trials and was published in 2012. The most recent citation comes from a 2023 study titled Bayesian approach for design and analysis of medical device trials in the era of modern clinical studies. This article reached its peak citation in 2018, with 3 citations. It has been cited in 9 different journals, 11% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics cited this research the most, with 6 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.