Accidental rhetoric: The root metaphors of three mile Island

Article Properties
Cite
Farrell, Thomas B., and G. Thomas Goodnight. “Accidental Rhetoric: The Root Metaphors of Three Mile Island”. Communication Monographs, vol. 48, no. 4, 1981, pp. 271-00, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758109376063.
Farrell, T. B., & Goodnight, G. T. (1981). Accidental rhetoric: The root metaphors of three mile Island. Communication Monographs, 48(4), 271-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758109376063
Farrell, Thomas B., and G. Thomas Goodnight. “Accidental Rhetoric: The Root Metaphors of Three Mile Island”. Communication Monographs 48, no. 4 (1981): 271-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758109376063.
Farrell TB, Goodnight GT. Accidental rhetoric: The root metaphors of three mile Island. Communication Monographs. 1981;48(4):271-300.
Journal Categories
Language and Literature
Philology
Linguistics
Communication
Mass media
Social Sciences
You May Also Like
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Blueprint for Breakdown: Three Mile Island and the Media Before the Accident Journal of Communication
  • Social Sciences
  • Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media
 13 1981
In search of Ariadne's thread: A review of the recent literature on rhetorical theory Central States Speech Journal 55 1978
On viewing rhetoric as epistemic: Ten years later Central States Speech Journal 84 1976
The "Movement" Moves on to Antinuclear Protest Science
  • Science: Science (General)
 1 1979
What Is News? Journal of Communication
  • Social Sciences
  • Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media
 2 1976
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Seeking Consensus on Confusing and Contentious Issues: Young Norwegians’ Experiences of Environmental Debates Environmental Communication
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Social Sciences
 2024
Rhetorical citizenship and the environment

 Climate Resilience and Sustainability
  • Science: Physics: Meteorology. Climatology
 2 2023
Internal Deliberation Defending Climate-Harmful Behavior

 Argumentation
  • Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
  • Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media
  • Social Sciences
 4 2022
Do you think I can make friends with it? Exploring performative potential of the echo through myth and Autoethnography Text and Performance Quarterly
  • Social Sciences: Social sciences (General)
 2022
Topical Analysis of Nuclear Experts' Perceptions of Publics, Nuclear Energy, and Sustainable Futures

 Frontiers in Communication
  • Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media
  • Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media
 2 2022
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media64
Social Sciences39
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business7
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)7
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences6
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business: Business communication. Including business report writing, business correspondence5
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business: Marketing. Distribution of products5
Language and Literature3
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business: Personnel management. Employment management2
Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science2
Social Sciences: Sociology (General)2
Education: Theory and practice of education1
Medicine: Internal medicine: Special situations and conditions: Industrial medicine. Industrial hygiene1
Education1
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology1
Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor: Management. Industrial management1
Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics1
History (General) and history of Europe: History (General)1
Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor1
Social Sciences: Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform1
Social Sciences: Communities. Classes. Races: Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology: City planning1
Medicine: Public aspects of medicine: Toxicology. Poisons1
Technology: Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering1
Science: Biology (General): Ecology1
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)1
Political science1
Social Sciences: Social sciences (General)1
The category Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media 64 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Persistent Questions in the Theory of Argument Fields and was published in 1982. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled Seeking Consensus on Confusing and Contentious Issues: Young Norwegians’ Experiences of Environmental Debates. This article reached its peak citation in 2008, with 5 citations. It has been cited in 40 different journals, 5% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Quarterly Journal of Speech cited this research the most, with 14 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year