Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks

Article Properties
  • Language
    English
  • Publication Date
    2001/08/01
  • Indian UGC (Journal)
  • Refrences
    153
  • Citations
    9,113
  • Miller McPherson Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721;Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708;
  • Lynn Smith-Lovin Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721;Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708;
  • James M Cook Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721;Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708;
Abstract
Cite
McPherson, Miller, et al. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks”. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 27, no. 1, 2001, pp. 415-44, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415-444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology. 2001;27(1):415-44.
Journal Categories
Social Sciences
Social Sciences
Sociology (General)
Description

Why do people tend to connect with others who are similar to them? This research delves into the homophily principle, exploring how similarity shapes social networks across various relationships, from marriage to information transfer. The study reveals that personal networks are often homogeneous in terms of sociodemographic, behavioral, and intrapersonal characteristics. It highlights race and ethnicity as the strongest dividing factors, followed by age, religion, education, occupation, and gender. The influence of geographic propinquity, families, organizations, and social systems are also examined, showing how these contexts foster homophilous relations. By understanding the powerful implications of homophily on information reception, attitude formation, and social interaction, researchers and policymakers can gain valuable insights. This comprehensive analysis underscores the need for further investigation into ecological processes, multiplex ties, and the co-evolution of networks and social entities, revealing how individuals form their social circles and localized positions in our world.

Published in the Annual Review of Sociology, this paper is highly relevant to the journal's broad scope in examining social structures and dynamics. Its focus on homophily and social networks directly addresses key sociological concepts, such as social connection, group formation, and the influence of social contexts. By exploring these dynamics, the paper contributes to the journal's mission of providing insightful analyses of social patterns and processes.

Refrences
Citations
Citations Analysis
The first research to cite this article was titled A Plague of Viruses: Biological, Computer and Marketing and was published in 2001. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled A Plague of Viruses: Biological, Computer and Marketing . This article reached its peak citation in 2022 , with 872 citations.It has been cited in 2,490 different journals, 10% of which are open access. Among related journals, the SSRN Electronic Journal cited this research the most, with 532 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year