Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment

Article Properties
  • Language
    English
  • Publication Date
    2000/08/01
  • Indian UGC (Journal)
  • Refrences
    161
  • Citations
    4,258
  • Robert D. Benford Department of Sociology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0324;
  • David A. Snow Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721;
Abstract
Cite
Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment”. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 26, no. 1, 2000, pp. 611-39, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611-639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
Benford RD, Snow DA. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology. 2000;26(1):611-39.
Journal Categories
Social Sciences
Social Sciences
Sociology (General)
Description

How do social movements shape public opinion and mobilize support? This review examines the role of framing processes in understanding social movement dynamics, highlighting collective action frames as central to their character and course. Framing processes have come to be regarded, alongside resource mobilization and political opportunity processes, as a central dynamic in understanding the character and course of social movements. Framing processes have come to be regarded, alongside resource mobilization and political opportunity processes, as a central dynamic in understanding the character and course of social movements. The authors review how collective action frames have been conceptualized, including their characteristic and variable features. They then examine the literature related to framing dynamics and processes, reviewing the literature regarding various contextual factors that constrain and facilitate framing processes. The review concludes with an elaboration of the consequences of framing processes for other movement processes and outcomes. The authors seek throughout to provide clarification of the linkages between framing concepts/processes and other conceptual and theoretical formulations relevant to social movements, such as schemas and ideology. This review provides a valuable resource for students and scholars interested in social movements, framing theory, and collective action.

Published in the Annual Review of Sociology, this paper is a perfect fit for the journal's mission of providing comprehensive overviews of key topics in sociology. By reviewing and assessing the literature on framing processes and social movements, the article offers a valuable resource for sociologists and researchers interested in understanding the dynamics of collective action. The focus on conceptual clarity and theoretical linkages aligns with the journal's commitment to advancing sociological knowledge.

Refrences
Citations
Citations Analysis
The first research to cite this article was titled Mobilization Forum: Comment on Oliver and Johnston and was published in 2000. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled Mobilization Forum: Comment on Oliver and Johnston . This article reached its peak citation in 2022 , with 342 citations.It has been cited in 1,425 different journals, 12% of which are open access. Among related journals, the SSRN Electronic Journal cited this research the most, with 105 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year