POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONALISM: Explaining Durability and Change

Article Properties
  • Language
    English
  • Publication Date
    1999/08/01
  • Indian UGC (Journal)
  • Refrences
    157
  • Citations
    609
  • Elisabeth S. Clemens Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721;,
  • James M. Cook Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721;,
Abstract
Cite
Clemens, Elisabeth S., and James M. Cook. “POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONALISM: Explaining Durability and Change”. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 25, no. 1, 1999, pp. 441-66, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.441.
Clemens, E. S., & Cook, J. M. (1999). POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONALISM: Explaining Durability and Change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 441-466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.441
Clemens ES, Cook JM. POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONALISM: Explaining Durability and Change. Annual Review of Sociology. 1999;25(1):441-66.
Journal Categories
Social Sciences
Social Sciences
Sociology (General)
Description

What components of institutional change can be identified? This review explores the “institutionalisms” in political science and sociology, various components of institutional change are identified: mutability, contradiction, multiplicity, containment and diffusion, learning and innovation, and mediation. This exercise results in a number of clear prescriptions for the analysis of politics and institutional change: disaggregate institutions into schemas and resources; decompose institutional durability into processes of reproduction, disruption, and response to disruption; and, above all, appreciate the multiplicity and heterogeneity of the institutions that make up the social world. Identities, interests, alternatives, and political innovation illustrates how political scientists and sociologists have begun to document the consequences of institutional contradiction and multiplicity and to trace the workings of institutional containment, diffusion, and mediation. This analysis has consequences for institutional contradiction and multiplicity and to trace the workings of institutional containment, diffusion, and mediation.

Published in the Annual Review of Sociology, this research is suitable because it focuses on various components of institutional change that could be identified: mutability, contradiction, multiplicity, containment and diffusion, learning and innovation, and mediation. It addresses concepts in the social sciences.

Refrences
Citations
Citations Analysis
The first research to cite this article was titled The Institutional Framing of Policy Debates and was published in 1999. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled The Institutional Framing of Policy Debates . This article reached its peak citation in 2012 , with 46 citations.It has been cited in 331 different journals, 5% of which are open access. Among related journals, the SSRN Electronic Journal cited this research the most, with 23 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year