Synaptic Plasticity and Memory: An Evaluation of the Hypothesis

Article Properties
  • Language
    English
  • Publication Date
    2000/03/01
  • Indian UGC (Journal)
  • Refrences
    360
  • Citations
    1,829
  • S. J. Martin Department and Centre for Neuroscience, The University of Edinburgh, Crichton Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9LE, United Kingdom;, ,
  • P. D. Grimwood Department and Centre for Neuroscience, The University of Edinburgh, Crichton Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9LE, United Kingdom;, ,
  • R. G. M. Morris Department and Centre for Neuroscience, The University of Edinburgh, Crichton Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9LE, United Kingdom;, ,
Abstract
Cite
Martin, S. J., et al. “Synaptic Plasticity and Memory: An Evaluation of the Hypothesis”. Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 1, 2000, pp. 649-11, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.649.
Martin, S. J., Grimwood, P. D., & Morris, R. G. M. (2000). Synaptic Plasticity and Memory: An Evaluation of the Hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23(1), 649-711. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.649
Martin SJ, Grimwood PD, Morris RGM. Synaptic Plasticity and Memory: An Evaluation of the Hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2000;23(1):649-711.
Journal Categories
Medicine
Internal medicine
Neurosciences
Biological psychiatry
Neuropsychiatry
Description

Is synaptic plasticity the key to understanding memory? This comprehensive review critically evaluates the synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis, which posits that activity-dependent synaptic changes during memory formation are both necessary and sufficient for information storage in the brain. The authors outline criteria for judging this hypothesis and describe various experimental strategies used to investigate it. The review examines classical and newly discovered properties of synaptic plasticity, emphasizing the importance of neural architecture and synaptic learning rules. Focusing on memories mediated by the hippocampus, amygdala, and cortex, the authors analyze a wealth of data regarding synaptic plasticity's role in learning and memory. Ultimately, the review concludes that while substantial evidence supports the necessity of synaptic plasticity for learning and memory, limited data currently supports the notion of sufficiency. Further research is needed to prove synaptic plasticity's sufficiency in learning and memory.

As a review article published in the _Annual Review of Neuroscience_, this work provides a broad overview and critical synthesis of the existing literature on synaptic plasticity and memory. It aligns with the journal's mission to provide comprehensive and authoritative reviews of key topics in neuroscience.

Refrences
Citations
Citations Analysis
The first research to cite this article was titled Neuroscience: Breaking Down Scientific Barriers to the Study of Brain and Mind and was published in 2000. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled Neuroscience: Breaking Down Scientific Barriers to the Study of Brain and Mind . This article reached its peak citation in 2022 , with 108 citations.It has been cited in 519 different journals, 19% of which are open access. Among related journals, the The Journal of Neuroscience cited this research the most, with 79 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year