An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling

Article Properties
  • Language
    English
  • Publication Date
    1999/12/01
  • Indian UGC (Journal)
  • Refrences
    47
  • Citations
    114
  • Yair Wand Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
  • Veda C. Storey Georgia State Univ., Atlanta
  • Ron Weber Univ. of Queensland, Australia
Abstract
Cite
Wand, Yair, et al. “An Ontological Analysis of the Relationship Construct in Conceptual Modeling”. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. 24, no. 4, 1999, pp. 494-28, https://doi.org/10.1145/331983.331989.
Wand, Y., Storey, V. C., & Weber, R. (1999). An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 24(4), 494-528. https://doi.org/10.1145/331983.331989
Wand Y, Storey VC, Weber R. An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling. ACM Transactions on Database Systems. 1999;24(4):494-528.
Journal Categories
Science
Mathematics
Instruments and machines
Electronic computers
Computer science
Science
Mathematics
Instruments and machines
Electronic computers
Computer science
Computer software
Science
Science (General)
Cybernetics
Information theory
Technology
Electrical engineering
Electronics
Nuclear engineering
Electronics
Computer engineering
Computer hardware
Description

Ever been puzzled by the nuances of relationship constructs in conceptual modeling? This paper tackles the critical, yet often ambiguous, concept of 'relationship' in semantic data models, essential for capturing application domain meaning. The study leverages ontology to rigorously define conceptual modeling constructs and address user confusion regarding associations between entities, attributes, and relationships. It delves into the ontological analysis of the relationship construct, providing precise definitions crucial for effective conceptual modeling. It explores how these constructs are used in object-oriented approaches to systems analysis and design. The authors derive specific rules for utilizing relationships within entity-relationship conceptual modeling, aiming to resolve ambiguities and enhance the capacity of models to capture knowledge about application domains. The study integrates concepts from ontology, a branch of philosophy, to ground the meaning of modeling constructs in models of reality. By clarifying the role of relationships, this research offers practical guidelines for improving the accuracy and expressiveness of conceptual models. The derived rules aim to eliminate current practice ambiguities and boost the models’ capacity to seize knowledge of the target application domain, enhancing knowledge capture about a real-world domain. This clarity is essential for developers, analysts, and anyone involved in designing and interpreting conceptual models, contributing to more effective communication and understanding of complex systems.

Published in ACM Transactions on Database Systems, this paper aligns with the journal's focus on advancing database systems and data management techniques. By providing a rigorous ontological analysis of relationship constructs in conceptual modeling, it contributes to the theoretical foundations and practical applications of database design, addressing a common challenge in communicating application domain meaning and enriching the journal's discourse on effective data modeling methodologies.

Refrences
Citations
Citations Analysis
The first research to cite this article was titled Emancipating instances from the tyranny of classes in information modeling and was published in 2000. The most recent citation comes from a 2023 study titled Emancipating instances from the tyranny of classes in information modeling . This article reached its peak citation in 2007 , with 10 citations.It has been cited in 58 different journals, 10% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Journal of Database Management cited this research the most, with 8 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year