Contamination of Catheter-Drawn Blood Cultures

Article Properties
  • Language
    English
  • Publication Date
    2001/09/01
  • Indian UGC (Journal)
  • Refrences
    10
  • Richard J. Everts Clinical Microbiology Laboratory,1 Duke University Medical Center, and
  • Emily N. Vinson Clinical Microbiology Laboratory,1 Duke University Medical Center, and
  • Paul O. Adholla Clinical Microbiology Laboratory,1 Duke University Medical Center, and
  • L. Barth Reller Clinical Microbiology Laboratory,1 Duke University Medical Center, andDepartments of Medicine2 andPathology,3 Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710
Abstract
Cite
Everts, Richard J., et al. “Contamination of Catheter-Drawn Blood Cultures”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 9, 2001, pp. 3393-4, https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.39.9.3393-3394.2001.
Everts, R. J., Vinson, E. N., Adholla, P. O., & Reller, L. B. (2001). Contamination of Catheter-Drawn Blood Cultures. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 39(9), 3393-3394. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.39.9.3393-3394.2001
Everts RJ, Vinson EN, Adholla PO, Reller LB. Contamination of Catheter-Drawn Blood Cultures. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2001;39(9):3393-4.
Journal Categories
Medicine
Internal medicine
Infectious and parasitic diseases
Medicine
Internal medicine
Specialties of internal medicine
Immunologic diseases
Allergy
Science
Microbiology
Description

Are catheter-drawn blood cultures more prone to contamination? This retrospective study compares the contamination rates of blood cultures drawn from catheters versus direct venipuncture. The research seeks to determine the preferred method for obtaining blood cultures to minimize contamination and ensure accurate diagnostic results. The study reviewed 1,408 matched pairs of simultaneous catheter-drawn and venipuncture blood cultures. The results indicated that while both methods showed similar rates of truly positive cultures, catheter-drawn cultures had a significantly higher contamination rate compared to venipuncture cultures. Based on these findings, the study recommends direct venipuncture as the preferred method for obtaining blood cultures. By reducing the risk of contamination, this approach improves the reliability of diagnostic testing and supports more informed clinical decision-making, contributing to enhanced patient care.

"Journal of Clinical Microbiology" focuses on research related to clinical microbiology and diagnostic techniques. This paper comparing contamination rates in blood cultures aligns perfectly with the journal's scope. The findings have direct implications for clinical practice in microbiology laboratories, impacting procedures for obtaining and interpreting blood culture results.

Refrences