Comparison of Methods to Measure Grinding Temperatures

Article Properties
  • Language
    English
  • DOI (url)
  • Publication Date
    2000/08/01
  • Indian UGC (Journal)
  • Refrences
    19
  • Citations
    80
  • Xipeng Xu Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-2210
  • Stephen Malkin Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-2210
Abstract
Cite
Xu, Xipeng, and Stephen Malkin. “Comparison of Methods to Measure Grinding Temperatures”. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 123, no. 2, 2000, pp. 191-5, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1369358.
Xu, X., & Malkin, S. (2000). Comparison of Methods to Measure Grinding Temperatures. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 123(2), 191-195. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1369358
Xu X, Malkin S. Comparison of Methods to Measure Grinding Temperatures. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2000;123(2):191-5.
Journal Categories
Technology
Engineering (General)
Civil engineering (General)
Technology
Manufactures
Technology
Mechanical engineering and machinery
Description

How accurately can we measure temperatures during grinding? This study compares three techniques for measuring grinding temperatures to estimate energy partition to the workpiece, a crucial factor in manufacturing processes. The investigation uses an embedded thermocouple, a two-color infrared detector, and a foil/workpiece thermocouple under identical surface grinding conditions. The research focuses on experimental measurements of grinding temperatures. The study reveals that all three methods—embedded thermocouple, infrared detector, and foil/workpiece thermocouple—yield comparable temperature responses. These results are consistent with analytical predictions for the same energy partition, enhancing our understanding of the thermal aspects of grinding. The methodology section details the setup and execution of the temperature measurements, ensuring the reliability and validity of the data collected. The comparable temperature responses obtained from different temperature measuring techniques in grinding have significant implications for optimizing manufacturing processes. The findings confirm that different methods can reliably estimate energy partition in grinding, which can aid in improving the efficiency and quality of machined parts.

As a publication in the Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, this paper aligns perfectly with the journal’s focus on advancing manufacturing processes. The research directly contributes to the understanding and optimization of grinding techniques, a key area within manufacturing science. Its detailed comparison of temperature measurement methods provides valuable insights for engineers and researchers in the field.

Refrences
Citations
Citations Analysis
The first research to cite this article was titled Thermal aspects in the face grinding of ceramics and was published in 2002. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled Thermal aspects in the face grinding of ceramics . This article reached its peak citation in 2018 , with 6 citations.It has been cited in 33 different journals, 6% of which are open access. Among related journals, the The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology cited this research the most, with 15 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year