How can disaster response be improved? This paper examines the complexities of disaster response co-ordination in the UK, challenging the common assumption that co-ordination is the ultimate goal. It highlights a critical gap in understanding, where the term 'co-ordination' is often used interchangeably with 'co-operation' and 'liaison,' leading to ambiguity in planning and execution. By analyzing UK disaster-response planning, the study reveals the *ad hoc* nature of legislation and management practices. It argues that co-operation may be a more effective and accessible objective than strict co-ordination, given the existing framework. The research identifies key factors influencing current trends in disaster management and explores practical and theoretical issues related to streamlining response efforts. Ultimately, the study concludes that co-ordination via feedback loops will likely remain the dominant approach, aligning with established practices. This ensures that co-ordination is both functionally specific and a general aspiration. In essence, this study encourages a shift in perspective towards prioritizing co-operation as a more realistic and achievable element for successful disaster response.
Published in Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, this paper aligns with the journal's focus on improving disaster response strategies. By examining the UK's approach, it contributes to the broader discussion on effective disaster management, a key theme within the journal. The paper's citations of related works further contextualize its significance in the field.