Facing strict environmental regulations and high resistivity dust, which electrostatic precipitator (ESP) technology offers the most economically viable solution? This paper provides a parametric cost comparison between pulsed and conventional ESPs across four major industrial sectors: electric power generation, cement manufacturing, iron and steel production, and the glass industry. The analysis aims to identify the operating parameters that significantly impact the economic feasibility of widespread pulsed ESP adoption. The research delves into the factors influencing the economic convenience of pulsed ESPs, including dust resistivity, energy consumption, and maintenance costs. By considering these parameters within the context of specific industrial applications, the paper offers a nuanced understanding of the trade-offs between pulsed and conventional ESP technologies. Ultimately, this economic analysis provides valuable insights for industries seeking to comply with environmental regulations while optimizing their operational costs. The findings help decision-makers assess the economic viability of large-scale pulsed ESP implementation, enabling them to make informed choices for sustainable industrial practices.