How can we best understand the principles, norms, rules, and procedures that govern state behavior in international relations? This article explores the possibility of integrating three prominent schools of thought—neoliberalism, realism, and cognitivism—to enhance our understanding of international regimes. Each of these schools offers distinct perspectives on the origins, stability, and consequences of international regimes. By synthesizing these perspectives, researchers can potentially achieve greater explanatory power. Working toward such a synthesis allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics that shape international cooperation and governance in various issue areas.
Review of International Studies publishes research in the theory and practice of international relations. This article aligns with the journal's focus on theoretical frameworks for understanding global politics. It contributes to the ongoing discussion about the nature and function of international regimes.