Can miracles be logically reconciled with the laws of nature? This philosophical exploration delves into the metaphysics and modality of miracles, framing them as natural events with supernatural causes. The paper navigates the complex terrain of causal interaction, arguing that such interaction is not logically impossible, even if it entails violations of natural laws. Challenging Humean supervenience views, the study posits that if such violations occur, they highlight the distinction between nomic and logical modalities, revealing that what is naturally impossible may be actual. By arguing that miracles can involve violations of natural laws, the author engages with core questions about the nature of reality and causality. This exploration demonstrates the logical possibility of events that transcend the ordinary course of nature, offering a framework for understanding miracles that considers both natural and supernatural dimensions. The theory presented contrasts favorably with competing views, enriching the debate on miracles within philosophy and theology. Furthermore, it challenges traditional interpretations, suggesting, contrary to Aquinas, that Creation could indeed be considered a miracle, broadening the scope of what constitutes a miraculous event and its implications for understanding the divine.
Published in Religious Studies, this paper engages with the journal's focus on the intersection of philosophy, psychology, and religion. By examining the metaphysical and modal implications of miracles, it contributes to ongoing discussions about the nature of religious experience and belief, offering a fresh perspective on the relationship between the natural and supernatural realms. It aligns with the journal's commitment to scholarly inquiry into religious phenomena.