Is the design argument anthropocentric? This philosophical exploration tackles the common criticism that the design argument for God’s existence relies on anthropocentrism. The paper scrutinizes various claims, from the argument’s origins to the appeal of humanity’s special role, ultimately questioning the need for a universe designed solely for humans. The work examines the different criticism resting on anthropocentrism and the origin of the design argument. Critics often suggest anthropocentrism explains the design argument’s origin or the attraction to humanity as creation's purpose. However, the author argues the design argument doesn't require framing the universe's fitness for humans. It evaluates arguments related to the design of the universe. Addressing serious criticisms, the author proposes defenders of the design argument must either uphold an objectivist view of value or provide independent reasons for an intelligent designer to create our sort of universe. The work delves into philosophical dimensions by addressing the value and possibility of an intelligent designer.
Published in Religious Studies, this philosophical paper engages with theological debates about the existence of God. By examining the design argument and addressing criticisms related to anthropocentrism, the research aligns with the journal's focus on exploring the intersection of philosophy, religion, and related intellectual inquiries.