This article challenges the predominantly Global North perspectives in comparative law by reviewing the works of three prominent Thai comparative law professors: Preedee Kasemsup, Phijaisakdi Horayangkura, and Sanunkorn Sotthibandhu. Highlighting the challenges of transcending academic hegemony, the article examines how comparative law can incorporate diverse viewpoints and methodologies. The authors advocate for a more inclusive global dialogue within the discipline of law. The manuscript examines the scholars' contributions in light of comparative law theory, arguing that their unique insights from Thailand and the Global South can enrich the field. The study emphasizes how these scholars' locally developed concepts and modes of questioning can add fresh perspectives often overlooked in mainstream discourse. The paper reviews their contributions to comparative law, focusing on their approaches and methodologies. This analytical review advocates for greater inclusivity and diversity in comparative law. By bringing attention to Thai scholars and their work, the authors contribute to a broader understanding of legal systems worldwide, promoting a more balanced and representative field.
Published in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly, this article directly aligns with the journal's core mission of fostering global comparative legal scholarship. By examining the perspectives of Thai scholars, the paper contributes to a richer understanding of legal theory and practice, furthering the journal's goal of promoting international legal dialogue.