Research Integrity and Peer Review

Title Publication Date Language Citations
Value pluralism in research integrity2019/08/22English10
Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews2019/12/01English10
Text recycling in health sciences research literature: a rhetorical perspective2017/02/16English9
Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals2018/05/23English9
MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications2020/09/17English9
Reported use of reporting guidelines among JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute authors, editorial outcomes, and reviewer ratings related to adherence to guidelines and clarity of presentation2018/09/27English8
RePAIR consensus guidelines: Responsibilities of Publishers, Agencies, Institutions, and Researchers in protecting the integrity of the research record2018/12/01English8
Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report2022/09/19English7
Designing integrated research integrity training: authorship, publication, and peer review2018/02/26English7
Do declarative titles affect readers’ perceptions of research findings? A randomized trial2016/08/04English6
High impact nutrition and dietetics journals’ use of publication procedures to increase research transparency2020/08/31English6
Do peer review models affect clinicians’ trust in journals? A survey of junior doctors2017/06/29English6
Developing the Clarity and Openness in Reporting: E3-based (CORE) Reference user manual for creation of clinical study reports in the era of clinical trial transparency2016/05/03English6
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers2022/02/21English6
Selective citation in the literature on swimming in chlorinated water and childhood asthma: a network analysis2017/10/02English5
Professional medical writing support and the quality, ethics and timeliness of clinical trial reporting: a systematic review2019/07/10English5
Policy driven changes in animal research practices: mapping researchers’ attitudes towards animal-free innovations using the Netherlands as an example2019/04/23English5
Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis2023/05/03English5
Gender disparity in publication records: a qualitative study of women researchers in computing and engineering2021/12/01English5
New COPE guidelines on publication process manipulation: why they matter2018/11/26English5
Using democracy to award research funding: an observational study2017/09/15English5
Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion2020/05/15English5
A guide to applying the Good Publication Practice 3 guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region2019/10/02English5
Strengthening the incentives for responsible research practices in Australian health and medical research funding2021/08/02English5
Transparency of peer review: a semi-structured interview study with chief editors from social sciences and humanities2021/11/18English4
Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Research Integrity2016/07/01English4
Development of research integrity in France is on the rise: the introduction of research integrity officers was a progress2019/10/16English4
Critical evaluation of the guidelines of the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity and of their application2016/10/17English3
Impact of peer review on discussion of study limitations and strength of claims in randomized trial reports: a before and after study2019/09/16English3
Do journals instruct authors to address sex and gender in psychological science?2020/10/22English3