Research Integrity and Peer Review

Title Publication Date Language Citations
Publication and non-publication of clinical trials in PTSD: an overview2019/07/25English3
Publication proportions for registered breast cancer trials: before and following the introduction of the ClinicalTrials.gov results database2016/07/18English3
Selective citation in scientific literature on the human health effects of bisphenol A2019/03/29English3
Research Integrity and Peer Review—past highlights and future directions2018/03/06English3
Investigating and preventing scientific misconduct using Benford’s Law2023/04/11English3
The advantages of peer review over arbitration for resolving authorship disputes2019/05/30English3
Reviewer training to assess knowledge translation in funding applications is long overdue2017/08/01English3
Testing an active intervention to deter researchers’ use of questionable research practices2019/11/29English2
Responsible research practices could be more strongly endorsed by Australian university codes of research conduct2023/06/06English2
Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling2023/04/24English2
Doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals2020/11/13English2
Survey study of research integrity officers’ perceptions of research practices associated with instances of research misconduct2020/12/01English2
A 10-year follow up of publishing ethics in China: what is new and what is unchanged2019/09/02English2
Comment on Cary Moskovitz’ “Text Recycling in Health Sciences Literature: A Rhetorical Perspective”2017/02/16English1
Evaluating ethics oversight during assessment of research integrity2019/11/06English1
Systematic overview of Freedom of Information Act requests to the Department of Health and Human Services from 2008 to 20172019/12/01English1
Individual versus general structured feedback to improve agreement in grant peer review: a randomized controlled trial2021/09/30English1
Raising concerns on questionable ethics approvals – a case study of 456 trials from the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection2023/08/03English1
Institutional capacity to prevent and manage research misconduct: perspectives from Kenyan research regulators2023/07/12English1
Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study2023/09/05English1
A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science2024/02/16English1
Cross-sectional study of medical advertisements in a national general medical journal: evidence, cost, and safe use of advertised versus comparative drugs2021/05/10English1
A new forum for research on research integrity and peer review2016/05/03English1
Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer review2021/02/16English1
Steps toward preregistration of research on research integrity2021/03/01English1
Proceedings from the IV Brazilian Meeting on Research Integrity, Science and Publication Ethics (IV BRISPE)2017/06/01English1
Peer review reduces spin in PCORI research reports2021/12/01English1
Reporting quality of abstracts and inconsistencies with full text articles in pediatric orthopedic publications2023/08/23English
Commentary: a broader perspective on the RePAIR consensus guidelines (Responsibilities of Publishers, Agencies, Institutions, and Researchers in protecting the integrity of the research record)2018/12/01English
Estimating the prevalence of text overlap in biomedical conference abstracts2021/02/01English