Research Integrity and Peer Review

Title Publication Date Language Citations
Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data2018/10/29English21
Is it becoming harder to secure reviewers for peer review? A test with data from five ecology journals2016/11/04English20
The high costs of getting ethical and site-specific approvals for multi-centre research2016/12/01English20
Percentage-based Author Contribution Index: a universal measure of author contribution to scientific articles2017/11/03English19
Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices2021/06/02English19
Quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions2019/02/19English19
Concern noted: a descriptive study of editorial expressions of concern in PubMed and PubMed Central2017/05/27English18
Researchers’ perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam2019/12/01English18
Biomedical journal speed and efficiency: a cross-sectional pilot survey of author experiences2018/01/05English18
Replicability and replication in the humanities2019/01/09English17
Registration of randomized controlled trials in nursing journals2017/07/16English16
Personally perceived publication pressure: revising the Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) by using work stress models2019/04/09English16
What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis2022/03/04English16
‘Are you siding with a personality or the grant proposal?’: observations on how peer review panels function2017/12/01English15
Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey2019/11/27English14
Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 1) — a multi-actor qualitative study on success in science2021/01/14English14
Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot2023/06/20English14
Publishing computational research - a review of infrastructures for reproducible and transparent scholarly communication2020/07/14English13
Publishing descriptions of non-public clinical datasets: proposed guidance for researchers, repositories, editors and funding organisations2016/06/22English13
Simple decision-tree tool to facilitate author identification of reporting guidelines during submission: a before–after study2017/12/01English13
Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing2020/06/26English13
Students’ and supervisors’ knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencing2018/10/23English13
Measuring the data gap: inclusion of sex and gender reporting in diabetes research2019/05/07English12
Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice2021/04/15English12
Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam2021/05/03English12
Mentored peer review of standardized manuscripts as a teaching tool for residents: a pilot randomized controlled multi-center study2017/06/05English11
Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science2021/01/14English11
Innovating editorial practices: academic publishers at work2020/08/05English11
Reproducible and transparent research practices in published neurology research2020/02/28English11
Impact of US industry payment disclosure laws on payments to surgeons: a natural experiment2020/01/03English10