Research Integrity and Peer Review

Titel Veröffentlichungsdatum Sprache Zitate
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use2016/05/03English709
SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles2019/03/26English615
Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity2016/11/21English104
Conflict of interest disclosure in biomedical research: a review of current practices, biases, and the role of public registries in improving transparency2016/05/03English99
The limitations to our understanding of peer review2020/04/30English98
A randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (IICARus)2019/06/12English88
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews2016/09/04English76
A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review2021/11/14English70
The changing forms and expectations of peer review2018/09/20English55
What incentives increase data sharing in health and medical research? A systematic review2017/05/05English52
Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution2017/03/08English52
Beyond sex and gender difference in funding and reporting of health research2018/08/28English52
Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature2020/12/01English46
Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey2017/05/12English46
Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 20152016/06/07English45
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review2023/05/18English41
Reporting of sex and gender in randomized controlled trials in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study2017/09/01English38
The role of geographic bias in knowledge diffusion: a systematic review and narrative synthesis2020/01/15English37
Plagiarism in submitted manuscripts: incidence, characteristics and optimization of screening—case study in a major specialty medical journal2016/10/10English36
Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics2018/08/17English33
The acceptability of using a lottery to allocate research funding: a survey of applicants2020/02/03English33
Guidelines for open peer review implementation2019/02/27English30
Improving the process of research ethics review2017/08/18English29
Propagation of errors in citation networks: a study involving the entire citation network of a widely cited paper published in, and later retracted from, the journal Nature2016/05/03English27
Quantifying professionalism in peer review2020/07/24English27
Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP2019/06/05English22
Improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in academia2022/07/04English21
ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol2022/06/07English21
Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration2018/11/16English21
Factors associated with online media attention to research: a cohort study of articles evaluating cancer treatments2017/07/01English21