How Polus Was Refuted

Article Properties
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
The Refutation of Polus in Plato’s Gorgias Revisited

 Apeiron
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
 2 2017
The Refutation of Polus in Plato’s Gorgias Revisited

 Apeiron
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
 2 2017
Prudence and morality: Socrates versus moral philosophers South African Journal of Philosophy
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
 2014
Shame and Ambiguity in Plato's Gorgias Philosophy & Rhetoric
  • Language and Literature
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
 1 2008
Shame and Ambiguity in Plato's Gorgias Philosophy & Rhetoric
  • Language and Literature
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
 2008
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)6
Language and Literature3
Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media1
Social Sciences1
The category Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General) 6 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled What Socrates said—and why Gorgias and Polus did not respond: A reading of Socrates’ definition of rhetoric inGorgias461–466 and was published in 1999. The most recent citation comes from a 2017 study titled The Refutation of Polus in Plato’s Gorgias Revisited. This article reached its peak citation in 2017, with 2 citations. It has been cited in 4 different journals. Among related journals, the Philosophy & Rhetoric cited this research the most, with 2 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year