Why <i>E</i> Is Not Equal to <i>mc</i><sup>2</sup>

Article Properties
Cite
Naschie, M. S. El. “Why <i>E< i> Is Not Equal to <i>mc< i><sup>2< sup&Gt”;. Journal of Modern Physics, vol. 05, no. 09, 2014, pp. 743-50, https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2014.59084.
Naschie, M. S. E. (2014). Why <i>E</i> Is Not Equal to <i>mc</i><sup>2</sup>. Journal of Modern Physics, 05(09), 743-750. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2014.59084
Naschie MSE. Why <i>E</i> Is Not Equal to <i>mc</i><sup>2</sup>. Journal of Modern Physics. 2014;05(09):743-50.
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
10.1142/5536
10.1142/5536
10.1142/5536
10.1142/5536
10.1142/5536
Citations Analysis
The first research to cite this article was titled From <i>E</i> = <i>mc</i><sup>2</sup> to <i>E</i> = <i>mc</i><sup>2</sup>/22—A Short Account of the Most Famous Equation in Physics and Its Hidden Quantum Entanglement Origin and was published in 2014. The most recent citation comes from a 2018 study titled From Nikolay Umov <i>E=kmc<sup>2</sup></i> via Albert Einstein’s <i>E=γmc<sup>2</sup></i> to the Dark Energy Density of the Cosmos <i>E=(21/22)mc<sup>2</sup></i>. This article reached its peak citation in 2014, with 12 citations. It has been cited in 11 different journals. Among related journals, the Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications cited this research the most, with 9 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year