Individualizing Justice through Multiculturalism: The Liberals' Dilemma

Article Properties
Cite
Coleman, Doriane Lambelet. “Individualizing Justice through Multiculturalism: The Liberals’ Dilemma”. Columbia Law Review, vol. 96, no. 5, 1996, p. 1093, https://doi.org/10.2307/1123402.
Coleman, D. L. (1996). Individualizing Justice through Multiculturalism: The Liberals’ Dilemma. Columbia Law Review, 96(5), 1093. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123402
Coleman DL. Individualizing Justice through Multiculturalism: The Liberals’ Dilemma. Columbia Law Review. 1996;96(5):1093.
Journal Categories
Law
Law
Law in general
Comparative and uniform law
Jurisprudence
Comparative law
International uniform law
Commercial law
Social Sciences
You May Also Like
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Countering Hegemonic Knowledge in Cross-Cultural Research: Hofstede, Epistemic Violence and Imperialism Journal of Critical Southern Studies 2023
Historiosophy of policy of multiculturalism and gender citizenship Literature and Culture of Polissya 2019
Dalla Cultural Defense al "test culturale": luci e (soprattutto) ombre del dibattito italiano Sociologia del diritto
  • Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor: Labor. Work. Working class: Industrial sociology. Social conditions of labor
 1 2018
Humanity’s Subtensions: Culture Theory in US Death Penalty Mitigation Social Analysis
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Anthropology
  • Political science: Political theory
  • Social Sciences
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Anthropology
 2 2017
Humanity’s Subtensions: Culture Theory in US Death Penalty Mitigation Social Analysis
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Anthropology
  • Political science: Political theory
  • Social Sciences
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Anthropology
 2 2017
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Social Sciences15
Law8
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Anthropology4
Political science4
Social Sciences: Sociology (General)3
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)3
Medicine: Public aspects of medicine2
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology2
Medicine: Internal medicine: Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry: Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system: Psychiatry2
Social Sciences: Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology2
Political science: Political theory2
Medicine: Internal medicine: Special situations and conditions: Industrial medicine. Industrial hygiene1
Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics1
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Religions. Mythology. Rationalism1
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion1
Medicine: Medicine (General): Medical technology1
Law: Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence: Comparative law. International uniform law: Medical legislation1
Medicine: Medicine (General)1
Social Sciences: The family. Marriage. Woman: Women. Feminism1
Social Sciences: The family. Marriage. Woman1
Social Sciences: Social sciences (General)1
Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor1
Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor: Labor. Work. Working class: Industrial sociology. Social conditions of labor1
The category Social Sciences 15 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Behavior and the Law Reconsidered: Psychological Syndromes and Profiles and was published in 1998. The most recent citation comes from a 2023 study titled Countering Hegemonic Knowledge in Cross-Cultural Research: Hofstede, Epistemic Violence and Imperialism. This article reached its peak citation in 2001, with 5 citations. It has been cited in 27 different journals, 11% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Social Analysis cited this research the most, with 2 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year