Reclaiming Environmental Law: A Normative Critique of Comparative Risk Analysis

Article Properties
Cite
Hornstein, Donald T. “Reclaiming Environmental Law: A Normative Critique of Comparative Risk Analysis”. Columbia Law Review, vol. 92, no. 3, 1992, p. 562, https://doi.org/10.2307/1122954.
Hornstein, D. T. (1992). Reclaiming Environmental Law: A Normative Critique of Comparative Risk Analysis. Columbia Law Review, 92(3), 562. https://doi.org/10.2307/1122954
Hornstein DT. Reclaiming Environmental Law: A Normative Critique of Comparative Risk Analysis. Columbia Law Review. 1992;92(3):562.
Journal Categories
Law
Law
Law in general
Comparative and uniform law
Jurisprudence
Comparative law
International uniform law
Commercial law
Social Sciences
You May Also Like
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Use of Fracking Information Disclosure Policies to Reduce Uncertainty in Risk‐Based Decisions

 Review of Policy Research
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Political science
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Social Sciences
 1 2021
Understanding risk and regulatory reform Policy Studies
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Social Sciences
 2018
A Regional Ecological Risk Assessment of the Kaipara Harbour, New Zealand, Using a Relative Risk Model Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Science: Biology (General): Ecology
  • Technology: Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
  • Science: Biology (General): Ecology
 19 2014
A Point Source of a Different Color: Identifying a Gap in United States Regulatory Policy for “Green” CSO Treatment Using Constructed Wetlands Sustainability
  • Technology: Mechanical engineering and machinery: Renewable energy sources
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Technology: Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
  • Science: Biology (General): Ecology
 10 2014
Law, Environment, and the “Nondismal” Social Sciences

 Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  • Social Sciences
  • Law
  • Social Sciences: Sociology (General)
 3 2012
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Social Sciences10
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences7
Social Sciences: Sociology (General)6
Technology: Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering6
Science: Biology (General): Ecology6
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)4
Medicine: Internal medicine: Special situations and conditions: Industrial medicine. Industrial hygiene3
Social Sciences: Statistics2
Science: Mathematics2
Technology: Mechanical engineering and machinery: Renewable energy sources2
Political science2
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation1
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Human ecology. Anthropogeography: Settlements: Cities. Urban geography1
Social Sciences: Communities. Classes. Races: Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology1
Technology: Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General): Environmental engineering1
Technology: Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)1
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business: Personnel management. Employment management1
Social Sciences: The family. Marriage. Woman: Women. Feminism1
Law1
Medicine: Public aspects of medicine1
The category Social Sciences 10 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Jobs, Gender, and Foetal Protection Policies: From Muller v. Oregon to Johnson Controls and was published in 1996. The most recent citation comes from a 2021 study titled Use of Fracking Information Disclosure Policies to Reduce Uncertainty in Risk‐Based Decisions. This article reached its peak citation in 2004, with 4 citations. It has been cited in 15 different journals. Among related journals, the SSRN Electronic Journal cited this research the most, with 5 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year