Promoting Public-regarding Legislation through Statutory Interpretation: An Interest Group Model

Article Properties
Cite
Macey, Jonathan R. “Promoting Public-Regarding Legislation through Statutory Interpretation: An Interest Group Model”. Columbia Law Review, vol. 86, no. 2, 1986, p. 223, https://doi.org/10.2307/1122704.
Macey, J. R. (1986). Promoting Public-regarding Legislation through Statutory Interpretation: An Interest Group Model. Columbia Law Review, 86(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.2307/1122704
Macey JR. Promoting Public-regarding Legislation through Statutory Interpretation: An Interest Group Model. Columbia Law Review. 1986;86(2):223.
Journal Categories
Law
Law
Law in general
Comparative and uniform law
Jurisprudence
Comparative law
International uniform law
Commercial law
Social Sciences
You May Also Like
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
The Role of Courts in Technology Policy The Journal of Law and Economics
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
  • Law
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
 2 2018
The Role of Courts in Technology Policy SSRN Electronic Journal 2017
Who are the Regulators of Occupational Safety and Health Standards in Advanced Industrial Economies? SSRN Electronic Journal 1 2017
Prosecuting Beyond the Rule of Law: Corporate Mandates Imposed through Deferred Prosecution Agreements Journal of Legal Analysis
  • Law
  • Social Sciences
  • Law
 20 2016
The Rationalization of Policy: On the Relation between Democracy and the Rule of Law SSRN Electronic Journal 1 2015
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Law16
Social Sciences13
Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science7
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business6
Social Sciences: Sociology (General)5
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics3
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)3
Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor3
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)2
Political science2
Law: Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence: Comparative law. International uniform law: Commercial law2
History (General) and history of Europe: History (General)1
Social Sciences: Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform1
Law: Law of Europe1
Law: Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence1
The category Law 16 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Some Causes and Consequences of the Bifurcated Treatment of Economic Rights and “Other” Rights Under the United States Constitution and was published in 1992. The most recent citation comes from a 2018 study titled The Role of Courts in Technology Policy. This article reached its peak citation in 1993, with 4 citations. It has been cited in 19 different journals, 10% of which are open access. Among related journals, the SSRN Electronic Journal cited this research the most, with 20 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year