Why Restrain Alienation?

Article Properties
Cite
Epstein, Richard A. “Why Restrain Alienation?”. Columbia Law Review, vol. 85, no. 5, 1985, p. 970, https://doi.org/10.2307/1122459.
Epstein, R. A. (1985). Why Restrain Alienation?. Columbia Law Review, 85(5), 970. https://doi.org/10.2307/1122459
Epstein RA. Why Restrain Alienation?. Columbia Law Review. 1985;85(5):970.
Journal Categories
Law
Law
Law in general
Comparative and uniform law
Jurisprudence
Comparative law
International uniform law
Commercial law
Social Sciences
You May Also Like
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Response to Hewitt on Abortion

 Studia Humana
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
 2023
Conjoined Twins? Rejoinder to Wollen Philosophia
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
 2022
Classical Liberal Property and the Question of Institutional Choice The Journal of Legal Studies
  • Law: Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence: Comparative law. International uniform law: Commercial law
  • Law
  • Social Sciences
 2021
Rejoinder to Huemer on Animal Rights

 Studia Humana
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
 1 2021
Property and capital in the person: Lockean and neoliberal self‐ownership Constellations
  • Political science
 2 2019
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Social Sciences11
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)6
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics5
Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science4
Law4
Political science3
Social Sciences: Sociology (General)3
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)2
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business2
Medicine: Public aspects of medicine2
Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor2
Law: Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence: Comparative law. International uniform law: Commercial law2
The category Social Sciences 11 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Contract Remedies and Inalienable Rights and was published in 1986. The most recent citation comes from a 2023 study titled Response to Hewitt on Abortion. This article reached its peak citation in 2013, with 3 citations. It has been cited in 19 different journals, 5% of which are open access. Among related journals, the SSRN Electronic Journal cited this research the most, with 5 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year