The Legitimacy of Sustainability Standards: A Paradox Perspective

Article Properties
  • Language
    English
  • DOI (url)
    10.1177/26317877211049493
  • Publication Date
    2021/10/01
  • Journal
    Organization Theory
  • Indian UGC (journal)
  • Refrences
    107
  • Citations
    22
  • Patrick Haack HEC, Department of Strategy, Globalization, and Society, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Andreas Rasche Department of Management, Society and Communication, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark
Abstract
Cite
Haack, Patrick, and Andreas Rasche. “The Legitimacy of Sustainability Standards: A Paradox Perspective”. Organization Theory, vol. 2, no. 4, 2021, p. 263178772110494, https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211049493.
Haack, P., & Rasche, A. (2021). The Legitimacy of Sustainability Standards: A Paradox Perspective. Organization Theory, 2(4), 263178772110494. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211049493
Haack, Patrick, and Andreas Rasche. “The Legitimacy of Sustainability Standards: A Paradox Perspective”. Organization Theory 2, no. 4 (2021): 263178772110494. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211049493.
Haack P, Rasche A. The Legitimacy of Sustainability Standards: A Paradox Perspective. Organization Theory. 2021;2(4):263178772110494.
Journal Categories
Social Sciences
Social Sciences
Commerce
Business
Personnel management
Employment management
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Title 2010
Title 1999
Perspectives on Process Organization Studies: Dualities, Dialectics and Paradoxes in Organizational Life, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2018
Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox 2017
Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests 2008
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
From institutional integration to institutional demise: The disintegration of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) Critical Perspectives on Accounting
  • Social Sciences: Finance
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
 1 2024
How Do They Do it? An Empirically Based Taxonomy of Standards Development Organizations’ Resilience Strategies SSRN Electronic Journal 2024
Sustainability leadership: An integrative review and conceptual synthesis

 Business Strategy and the Environment
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business: Personnel management. Employment management
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
 1 2023
Building a bridge to the future: Prospective legitimation in nascent markets

 Strategic Management Journal
  • Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor: Management. Industrial management
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business: Personnel management. Employment management
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
 3 2023
Multi-stakeholder Initiatives and Legitimacy: A Deliberative Systems Perspective

 Business Ethics Quarterly
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
 2023
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science16
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business16
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business: Personnel management. Employment management10
Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor: Management. Industrial management7
Social Sciences: Finance2
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences2
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics2
Law2
Political science2
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)2
Social Sciences2
Agriculture: Agriculture (General)2
Technology: Mechanical engineering and machinery: Renewable energy sources1
Technology: Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering1
Science: Biology (General): Ecology1
The category Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science 16 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Sustainable transformation of accounting in agriculture and was published in 2022. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled How Do They Do it? An Empirically Based Taxonomy of Standards Development Organizations’ Resilience Strategies. This article reached its peak citation in 2023, with 16 citations. It has been cited in 17 different journals, 11% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Regulation & Governance cited this research the most, with 2 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year