Group Freedom: A Social Mechanism Account

Article Properties
Abstract
Cite
Hindriks, Frank. “Group Freedom: A Social Mechanism Account”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 47, no. 6, 2017, pp. 410-39, https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393117726172.
Hindriks, F. (2017). Group Freedom: A Social Mechanism Account. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 47(6), 410-439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393117726172
Hindriks, Frank. “Group Freedom: A Social Mechanism Account”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47, no. 6 (2017): 410-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393117726172.
Hindriks F. Group Freedom: A Social Mechanism Account. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 2017;47(6):410-39.
Journal Categories
Philosophy
Psychology
Religion
Ethics
Philosophy
Psychology
Religion
Philosophy (General)
Social Sciences
You May Also Like
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Racism in Mind 2004
Multiculturalism Reconsidered: “Culture and Equality” and Its Critics 2002
Liberal Rights 1993
The Idea of Freedom 1979
Principles of Social Psychology: 1st International Edition 2014
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Affirmative Action in the Political Domain

 Political Studies
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Political science
  • Social Sciences
 5 2022
How Social Objects (Fail to) Function Journal of Social Philosophy
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics
  • Social Sciences: Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
  • Social Sciences: Sociology (General)
  • Social Sciences
 5 2020
The creation of institutional reality, special theory of relativity, and mere Cambridge change

 Synthese
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
  • Social Sciences
 8 2019
The Duty to Join Forces: When Individuals Lack Control The Monist
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
 11 2019
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)3
Social Sciences3
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)1
Political science1
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics1
Social Sciences: Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform1
Social Sciences: Sociology (General)1
The category Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General) 3 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled The creation of institutional reality, special theory of relativity, and mere Cambridge change and was published in 2019. The most recent citation comes from a 2022 study titled Affirmative Action in the Political Domain. This article reached its peak citation in 2019, with 2 citations. It has been cited in 4 different journals. Among related journals, the Political Studies cited this research the most, with 1 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year