Understanding Public Opposition to a Separate Youth Justice System

Article Properties
Abstract
Cite
Sprott, Jane B. “Understanding Public Opposition to a Separate Youth Justice System”. Crime &Amp; Delinquency, vol. 44, no. 3, 1998, pp. 399-11, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128798044003004.
Sprott, J. B. (1998). Understanding Public Opposition to a Separate Youth Justice System. Crime &Amp; Delinquency, 44(3), 399-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128798044003004
Sprott, Jane B. “Understanding Public Opposition to a Separate Youth Justice System”. Crime &Amp; Delinquency 44, no. 3 (1998): 399-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128798044003004.
Sprott JB. Understanding Public Opposition to a Separate Youth Justice System. Crime & Delinquency. 1998;44(3):399-411.
Journal Categories
Social Sciences
Social Sciences
Industries
Land use
Labor
Social Sciences
Social pathology
Social and public welfare
Criminology
You May Also Like
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Title 1997
Title 1997
Public Opinion, Crime and Criminal Justice
Juvenile Justice and Public Policy: Toward a National Agenda
Becoming Delinquent: Young Offenders and the Correctional Process
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Understanding the Relationship Between Public Opinion and Experience With the Criminal Justice System International Journal of Public Opinion Research
  • Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media
  • Political science
  • Social Sciences
 6 2017
Race Matters: Public Views on Sentencing

 Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice
  • Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor
  • Social Sciences: Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
  • Social Sciences
 2017
Juvenile Transfer to Adult Court Criminology & Public Policy
  • Social Sciences: Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
  • Law
  • Social Sciences
 7 2016
The Views of the Public on Youth Offenders and the New Zealand Criminal Justice System

 International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
  • Social Sciences: Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology
  • Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor
  • Social Sciences
 2016
We Don’t Always Mean What We Say: Attitudes Toward Statutory Exclusion of Juvenile Offenders From Juvenile Court Jurisdiction Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 2015
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Social Sciences19
Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor17
Social Sciences: Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology17
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology6
Law5
Medicine: Internal medicine: Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry: Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system: Psychiatry4
Social Sciences: Social sciences (General)3
Social Sciences: The family. Marriage. Woman2
Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media1
Political science1
Technology: Manufactures: Production management. Operations management1
Medicine: Internal medicine: Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry: Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system: Psychiatry: Therapeutics. Psychotherapy1
The category Social Sciences 19 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Are members of the public tough on crime? and was published in 1999. The most recent citation comes from a 2017 study titled Understanding the Relationship Between Public Opinion and Experience With the Criminal Justice System. This article reached its peak citation in 1999, with 4 citations. It has been cited in 20 different journals. Among related journals, the Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice cited this research the most, with 4 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year