When should conscientious objection be accepted?

Article Properties
Journal Categories
Medicine
Medicine (General)
Medical philosophy
Medical ethics
Medicine
Medicine (General)
Medical technology
Medicine
Public aspects of medicine
Philosophy
Psychology
Religion
Ethics
Social Sciences
Social Sciences
Social history and conditions
Social problems
Social reform
You May Also Like
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Three Arguments Against Institutional Conscientious Objection, and Why They Are (Metaphysically) Unconvincing

 The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics
  • Medicine: Public aspects of medicine
  • Medicine: Public aspects of medicine
  • Social Sciences
 1 2024
Factors influencing the involvement of health care professionals in the administration of medical aid in dying in Quebec Ethics, Medicine and Public Health 2023
Conscientious objection to caring for transgender people: An ethical right or a discriminatory attitude?

 International Journal of Nursing Practice
  • Medicine: Public aspects of medicine
  • Medicine: Nursing
  • Medicine: Medicine (General)
 1 2023
Harmonizing conscience claims and patient access to assisted death

 Healthcare Management Forum 2023
The Ethics of Conscientious Objection to Teaching Physician-Assisted Death

 American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
  • Medicine: Medicine (General): Medical technology
  • Medicine: Medicine (General)
 2023
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Medicine: Public aspects of medicine36
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics33
Social Sciences31
Medicine: Medicine (General): Medical philosophy. Medical ethics22
Medicine: Medicine (General)13
Social Sciences: Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform13
Medicine: Medicine (General): Medical technology12
Medicine: Nursing7
Medicine: Internal medicine7
Social Sciences: Sociology (General)5
Medicine: Internal medicine: Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid2
Medicine: Internal medicine: Specialties of internal medicine: Diseases of the respiratory system2
Medicine: Internal medicine: Specialties of internal medicine: Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system2
Medicine: Internal medicine: Special situations and conditions: Industrial medicine. Industrial hygiene2
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion2
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)2
Medicine1
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)1
Political science1
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Religions. Mythology. Rationalism1
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business1
Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science1
Medicine: Internal medicine: Specialties of internal medicine: Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs1
Medicine: Gynecology and obstetrics1
Education: Education (General)1
The category Medicine: Public aspects of medicine 36 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled In Reply: and was published in 2012. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled Three Arguments Against Institutional Conscientious Objection, and Why They Are (Metaphysically) Unconvincing. This article reached its peak citation in 2019, with 10 citations. It has been cited in 35 different journals, 11% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Journal of Medical Ethics cited this research the most, with 8 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year