Is the Precautionary Principle Justiciable?
Article Properties
-
LanguageEnglish
-
DOI (url)
-
Publication Date2001/03/01
-
Journal
-
Indian UGC (journal)
-
Citations15
-
E. Fisher
Cite
Fisher, E. “Is the Precautionary Principle Justiciable?”. Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 13, no. 3, 2001, pp. 315-34, https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/13.3.315.
Fisher, E. (2001). Is the Precautionary Principle Justiciable?. Journal of Environmental Law, 13(3), 315-334. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/13.3.315
Fisher E. Is the Precautionary Principle Justiciable?. Journal of Environmental Law. 2001;13(3):315-34.
Journal Categories
Geography
Anthropology
Recreation
Environmental sciences
Law
Social Sciences
You May Also Like
- Legal rights for the Turag: rivers as living entities in Bangladesh
- The relevance of the no-harm principle to climate change law and politics
- The role of public and private insurance in reducing losses from extreme weather events and disasters
- Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses
- What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies
Citations
| Title | Journal | Journal Categories | Citations | Publication Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Science, precaution and innovation for sustainable fisheries: The judgement by the Court of Justice of the EU regarding the electric pulse fishing ban | Marine Policy |
| 2 | 2022 |
The Implementation of the Precautionary Principle in Nuclear Safety Regulation: Challenges and Prospects | Sustainability |
| 1 | 2021 |
A Law and Economics Perspective on Judicial Risk Regulation | European Journal of Risk Regulation |
| 3 | 2018 |
Law and Precaution in the European Risk Society: The Case of EU Environmental Policy | Ratio Juris | 2017 | ||
Eyes Wide Shut: On Risk, Rule of Law and Precaution | Ratio Juris | 2 | 2013 |
Citations Analysis
The category
Social Sciences 4
is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Hoffman v. Monsanto: Courts, Class Actions, and Perceptions of the Problem of GM Drift and was published in 2007. The most recent citation comes from a 2022 study titled Science, precaution and innovation for sustainable fisheries: The judgement by the Court of Justice of the EU regarding the electric pulse fishing ban. This article reached its peak citation in 2009, with 4 citations. It has been cited in 13 different journals. Among related journals, the Ratio Juris cited this research the most, with 2 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.