Signaling and Precedent in Federal District Court Opinions

Article Properties
Cite
Morriss, Andrew P., et al. “Signaling and Precedent in Federal District Court Opinions”. Supreme Court Economic Review, vol. 13, 2005, pp. 63-97, https://doi.org/10.1086/scer.13.3655301.
Morriss, A. P., Heise, M., & Sisk, G. C. (2005). Signaling and Precedent in Federal District Court Opinions. Supreme Court Economic Review, 13, 63-97. https://doi.org/10.1086/scer.13.3655301
Morriss, Andrew P., Michael Heise, and Gregory C. Sisk. “Signaling and Precedent in Federal District Court Opinions”. Supreme Court Economic Review 13 (2005): 63-97. https://doi.org/10.1086/scer.13.3655301.
Morriss AP, Heise M, Sisk GC. Signaling and Precedent in Federal District Court Opinions. Supreme Court Economic Review. 2005;13:63-97.
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Permitting Prohibitions The Journal of Legal Studies
  • Law: Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence: Comparative law. International uniform law: Commercial law
  • Law
  • Social Sciences
 2023
The Emerging Authority of Magistrate Judges within US District Courts

 Journal of Law and Courts
  • Law
 2022
Younger Federal District Court Judges Favor Presidential Power The Journal of Law and Economics
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
  • Law
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
 2020
Mapping the Iceberg: The Impact of Data Sources on the Study of District Courts

 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
  • Social Sciences
  • Law
 7 2020
The Role of Personal Attributes and Social Backgrounds on Judging SSRN Electronic Journal 2016
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Law10
Social Sciences7
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business4
Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science4
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)2
Political science2
Social Sciences: Sociology (General)1
Law: Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence: Comparative law. International uniform law: Commercial law1
The category Law 10 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled An Empirical Analysis of Hierarchy Effects in Judicial Decision Making and was published in 2007. The most recent citation comes from a 2023 study titled Permitting Prohibitions. This article reached its peak citation in 2015, with 3 citations. It has been cited in 11 different journals. Among related journals, the SSRN Electronic Journal cited this research the most, with 5 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year