Law and Neuroeconomics

Article Properties
Cite
Chorvat, Terrence, et al. “Law and Neuroeconomics”. Supreme Court Economic Review, vol. 13, 2005, pp. 35-62, https://doi.org/10.1086/scer.13.3655300.
Chorvat, T., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (2005). Law and Neuroeconomics. Supreme Court Economic Review, 13, 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1086/scer.13.3655300
Chorvat T, McCabe K, Smith V. Law and Neuroeconomics. Supreme Court Economic Review. 2005;13:35-62.
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
An introductory microeconomics in-class experiment to reinforce the marginal utility/price maximization rule and the integration of modern theory International Review of Economics Education
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
  • Education: Theory and practice of education
  • Education
  • Social Sciences
 3 2017
Paternalism and New Durable-Goods Energy Efficiency Standards: Consumers Ain't Misbehavinn SSRN Electronic Journal 2 2016
An Introductory Microeconomics In-class Experiment to Enhance Critical Thinking and the Integration of Modern Theory SSRN Electronic Journal 2016
After the Great Recession: Law and Economics’ Topics of Invention and Arrangement and Tropes of Style SSRN Electronic Journal 1 2012
False Promises? A Sociological Critique of the Behavioural Turn in Law and Economics Journal of Consumer Policy
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
 20 2011
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Social Sciences2
Law1
Social Sciences: Sociology (General)1
Technology: Chemical technology: Food processing and manufacture1
Agriculture1
Agriculture: Agriculture (General)1
Social Sciences: Commerce: Business1
Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science1
Education: Theory and practice of education1
Education1
The category Social Sciences 2 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Contrasting the Art of Economic Science with Pseudo-Economic Nonsense: The Distinction Between Reasonable Assumptions and Ridiculous Assumptions and was published in 2008. The most recent citation comes from a 2017 study titled An introductory microeconomics in-class experiment to reinforce the marginal utility/price maximization rule and the integration of modern theory. This article reached its peak citation in 2010, with 3 citations. It has been cited in 5 different journals. Among related journals, the SSRN Electronic Journal cited this research the most, with 5 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year