Error Costs, Legal Standards of Proof, and Statistical Significance

Article Properties
Cite
Burtis, Michelle M., et al. “Error Costs, Legal Standards of Proof, and Statistical Significance”. Supreme Court Economic Review, vol. 25, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1-57, https://doi.org/10.1086/694607.
Burtis, M. M., Gelbach, J. B., & Kobayashi, B. H. (2017). Error Costs, Legal Standards of Proof, and Statistical Significance. Supreme Court Economic Review, 25(1), 1-57. https://doi.org/10.1086/694607
Burtis MM, Gelbach JB, Kobayashi BH. Error Costs, Legal Standards of Proof, and Statistical Significance. Supreme Court Economic Review. 2017;25(1):1-57.
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Title 2018
Title 2017
Title 2015
Title 2013
Title 2013
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Evidence, probability, and relative plausibility: A response to Aitken, Taroni, and Bozza The International Journal of Evidence & Proof
  • Social Sciences
  • Law
2 2023
Error Costs, Ratio Tests, and Patent Antitrust Law Review of Industrial Organization
  • Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business: Personnel management. Employment management
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
1 2020
Error Costs, Ratio Tests, and Patent Antitrust Law SSRN Electronic Journal 2019
The Role of Legal Presumptions in Patent Litigation SSRN Electronic Journal 2019
A Comment on Statistical Significance and Standards of Proof Supreme Court Economic Review 2017
Citations Analysis
The category Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor 1 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled A Comment on Statistical Significance and Standards of Proof and was published in 2017. The most recent citation comes from a 2023 study titled Evidence, probability, and relative plausibility: A response to Aitken, Taroni, and Bozza. This article reached its peak citation in 2019, with 2 citations. It has been cited in 4 different journals. Among related journals, the SSRN Electronic Journal cited this research the most, with 2 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year