Ideals, realities and paradoxes of stakeholder participation in EU fisheries governance

Article Properties
Cite
Linke, Sebastian, and Svein Jentoft. “Ideals, Realities and Paradoxes of Stakeholder Participation in EU Fisheries Governance”. Environmental Sociology, vol. 2, no. 2, 2016, pp. 144-5, https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1155792.
Linke, S., & Jentoft, S. (2016). Ideals, realities and paradoxes of stakeholder participation in EU fisheries governance. Environmental Sociology, 2(2), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1155792
Linke S, Jentoft S. Ideals, realities and paradoxes of stakeholder participation in EU fisheries governance. Environmental Sociology. 2016;2(2):144-5.
Journal Category
Geography
Anthropology
Recreation
Environmental sciences
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Governing Europe’s Marine Environment. Europeanization of Regional Seas or Regionalization of EU Policies? 2015
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No …/.. Laying down Detailed Rules on the Functioning of the Advisory Councils under the Common Fisheries Policy 2014
Good Governance, Scale and Power A Case Study of North Sea Fisheries 2013
Draft Report on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Common Fisheries Policy 2013
Review of the functioning of the Regional Advisory Councils. Communication from the Commission 2008
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Identifying sustainability priorities among value chain actors in artisanal common octopus fisheries

Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
  • Agriculture: Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Oceanography
  • Science: Biology (General)
  • Agriculture: Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling
  • Agriculture: Plant culture
  • Agriculture: Animal culture
1 2023
Trends in a European coastal fishery with a special focus on small-scale fishers – Implications for fisheries policies and management Marine Policy
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Political science: International relations
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Social Sciences
1 2023
Aligning top‐down and bottom‐up modes of governance? How EU Fisheries Local Action Groups support small‐scale fisheries and coastal community development in Sweden

Sociologia Ruralis
  • Social Sciences: Sociology (General)
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
  • Social Sciences: Sociology (General)
  • Social Sciences
1 2023
A new hope for small-scale fisheries through local action groups? Comparing Finnish and Swedish experiences

Maritime Studies
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
4 2022
Blue Justice and the co-production of hermeneutical resources for small-scale fisheries Marine Policy
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Political science: International relations
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Social Sciences
15 2022
Citations Analysis
The category Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences 20 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled The legitimization of concern: A flexible framework for investigating the enactment of stakeholders in environmental planning and governance processes and was published in 2017. The most recent citation comes from a 2023 study titled Aligning top‐down and bottom‐up modes of governance? How EU Fisheries Local Action Groups support small‐scale fisheries and coastal community development in Sweden. This article reached its peak citation in 2022, with 5 citations. It has been cited in 16 different journals, 18% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Marine Policy cited this research the most, with 8 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year