Deliberative elitism? Distributed deliberation and the organization of epistemic inequality

Article Properties
Cite
Moore, Alfred. “Deliberative Elitism? Distributed Deliberation and the Organization of Epistemic Inequality”. Critical Policy Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, 2016, pp. 191-08, https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1165126.
Moore, A. (2016). Deliberative elitism? Distributed deliberation and the organization of epistemic inequality. Critical Policy Studies, 10(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1165126
Moore, Alfred. “Deliberative Elitism? Distributed Deliberation and the Organization of Epistemic Inequality”. Critical Policy Studies 10, no. 2 (2016): 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1165126.
Moore A. Deliberative elitism? Distributed deliberation and the organization of epistemic inequality. Critical Policy Studies. 2016;10(2):191-208.
Journal Categories
Political science
Political science
Political institutions and public administration (General)
Social Sciences
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Title 2007
Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement 1999
Deliberative Politics 1999
Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics 1997
Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics 1990
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Deep Learning Meets Deep Democracy: Deliberative Governance and Responsible Innovation in Artificial Intelligence

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
17 2022
Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens’ Juries The American Journal of Bioethics
  • Medicine: Medicine (General): Medical philosophy. Medical ethics
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics
  • Social Sciences: Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
  • Medicine: Public aspects of medicine
  • Social Sciences: Sociology (General)
  • Social Sciences
10 2022
Participation for just governance of food-system transition Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy
  • Social Sciences: Social sciences (General)
  • Technology: Mechanical engineering and machinery: Renewable energy sources
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
1 2022
Evidence in Norwegian child protection interventions – Analysing cases of familial violence

Child & Family Social Work
  • Social Sciences: The family. Marriage. Woman
  • Social Sciences: Social sciences (General)
  • Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor
  • Social Sciences
2 2022
Does democracy require value-neutral science? Analyzing the legitimacy of scientific information in the political sphere Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
  • History (General) and history of Europe: History (General)
  • Social Sciences
9 2021
Citations Analysis
The category Social Sciences 13 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled From experiments to ecosystems? Reviewing public participation, scientific governance and the systemic turn and was published in 2017. The most recent citation comes from a 2022 study titled Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens’ Juries. This article reached its peak citation in 2022, with 4 citations. It has been cited in 15 different journals, 6% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Critical Policy Studies cited this research the most, with 3 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year