Deliberative capital: recognition in participatory budgeting

Article Properties
Cite
Holdo, Markus. “Deliberative Capital: Recognition in Participatory Budgeting”. Critical Policy Studies, vol. 10, no. 4, 2015, pp. 391-09, https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1077718.
Holdo, M. (2015). Deliberative capital: recognition in participatory budgeting. Critical Policy Studies, 10(4), 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1077718
Holdo, Markus. “Deliberative Capital: Recognition in Participatory Budgeting”. Critical Policy Studies 10, no. 4 (2015): 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1077718.
Holdo M. Deliberative capital: recognition in participatory budgeting. Critical Policy Studies. 2015;10(4):391-409.
Journal Categories
Political science
Political science
Political institutions and public administration (General)
Social Sciences
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Title 2007
10.56021/9780801891748 2009
10.56021/9780801891748 2007
10.1515/9781626371378 2000
10.7551/mitpress/2324.001.0001 1997
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Mutual efforts for mutual trust: Impacts of citizens' knowledge and governmental communication channels on trust in participatory budgeting

 Journal of Public Affairs
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
 2023
Who is Interested in Participating in Participatory Budgeting?

 State Politics & Policy Quarterly
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Political science
  • Social Sciences
 2023
Class Inequalities and Participatory Democracy: Assessing the Impact of Social Inclusion Tools in Citizens’ Assemblies

 Political Studies Review
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Political science
  • Social Sciences
 2023
Deliberative Procedures as Social Technology

 Analyse & Kritik 2023
Picturing deliberation: How dissatisfied citizens make sense of it

 International Political Science Review
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Political science
  • Social Sciences
 2022
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Social Sciences15
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)13
Political science10
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences2
Social Sciences: Sociology (General)2
Technology: Mechanical engineering and machinery: Renewable energy sources1
Technology: Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering1
Science: Biology (General): Ecology1
Agriculture: Agriculture (General)1
Agriculture: Plant culture1
Agriculture1
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Religions. Mythology. Rationalism1
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion1
Social Sciences: Communities. Classes. Races: Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology: City planning1
Political science: International relations1
Social Sciences: Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform1
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Anthropology1
Medicine: Internal medicine: Special situations and conditions: Industrial medicine. Industrial hygiene1
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology1
Social Sciences: Social sciences (General)1
Medicine: Internal medicine: Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry: Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system: Psychiatry1
Education: Theory and practice of education1
Political science: Political science (General)1
The category Social Sciences 15 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled The Virtuous, the Critical and the Trustworthy: Citizen Ideals and Forms of Democratic Participation and was published in 2017. The most recent citation comes from a 2023 study titled Who is Interested in Participating in Participatory Budgeting?. This article reached its peak citation in 2023, with 4 citations. It has been cited in 22 different journals, 13% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Political Studies Review cited this research the most, with 2 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year