The legitimacy of multilateral climate governance: a deliberative democratic approach

Article Properties
Cite
Stevenson, Hayley, and John S. Dryzek. “The Legitimacy of Multilateral Climate Governance: A Deliberative Democratic Approach”. Critical Policy Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2012.659879.
Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. S. (2012). The legitimacy of multilateral climate governance: a deliberative democratic approach. Critical Policy Studies, 6(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2012.659879
Stevenson, Hayley, and John S. Dryzek. “The Legitimacy of Multilateral Climate Governance: A Deliberative Democratic Approach”. Critical Policy Studies 6, no. 1 (2012): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2012.659879.
Stevenson H, Dryzek JS. The legitimacy of multilateral climate governance: a deliberative democratic approach. Critical Policy Studies. 2012;6(1):1-18.
Journal Categories
Political science
Political science
Political institutions and public administration (General)
Social Sciences
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference: A Postmortem American Journal of International Law
  • Political science: International relations
  • Law
  • Law: Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence: Comparative law. International uniform law: Commercial law
  • Social Sciences
 118 2010
10.1515/9780691234168-005 1996
10.1515/9780691234168-005 2009
10.1515/9780691234168-005 Foreign Policy 2009
10.1007/978-1-349-21599-7 1991
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
‘How dare you!’: a conceptualization of the eco-shaming discourse in Belgium Critical Policy Studies
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Political science
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Social Sciences
 1 2023
Transforming our world? Discursive representation in the negotiations on the Sustainable Development Goals

 International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Law
  • Political science
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Social Sciences
 5 2020
Truth and power: deliberation and emotions in climate adaptation processes Environmental Politics
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Political science
  • Social Sciences
 2 2020
Beyond Climate Impacts: Knowledge Gaps and Process-Based Reflection on Preparing a Regional Chapter for the Fourth National Climate Assessment

 Weather, Climate, and Society
  • Science: Physics: Meteorology. Climatology
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Science: Geology
  • Science: Geology
 2020
Looking at the World Bank’s safeguard reform through the lens of deliberative democracy

 Leiden Journal of International Law
  • Social Sciences
  • Law
 2019
Citations Analysis
Category Category Repetition
Social Sciences10
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences9
Political science5
Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science3
Technology: Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering3
Science: Biology (General): Ecology3
Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)3
Technology: Mechanical engineering and machinery: Renewable energy sources2
Law2
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Ethics2
Agriculture: Forestry1
Science: Botany: Plant ecology1
Agriculture: Plant culture1
Agriculture: Animal culture1
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation1
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Human ecology. Anthropogeography: Settlements: Cities. Urban geography1
Social Sciences: Communities. Classes. Races: Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology1
Social Sciences: Communities. Classes. Races: Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology: City planning1
Political science: International relations1
Science: Physics: Meteorology. Climatology1
Science: Geology1
Fine Arts: Architecture1
Social Sciences: Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform1
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)1
Social Sciences: Sociology (General)1
The category Social Sciences 10 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Representing Green Radicalism: the limits of state-based representation in global climate governance and was published in 2013. The most recent citation comes from a 2023 study titled ‘How dare you!’: a conceptualization of the eco-shaming discourse in Belgium. This article reached its peak citation in 2017, with 4 citations. It has been cited in 16 different journals, 12% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Critical Policy Studies cited this research the most, with 2 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year