State capacity and the paradox of authoritarian elections
Article Properties
-
LanguageEnglish
-
DOI (url)
-
Publication Date2014/11/10
-
Journal
-
Indian UGC (journal)
-
Refrences57
-
Citations31
-
Merete Bech Seeberg
Journal Categories
Political science
Political science
Political institutions and public administration (General)
Social Sciences
You May Also Like
- Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy
- Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation
- Explaining Workers' Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland
- Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain
- Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model
Refrences
| Title | Journal | Journal Categories | Citations | Publication Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1515/9781400858101.70 | 1986 | |||
| 10.1007/978-1-349-03342-3_3 | 1978 | |||
| 10.1353/book.3263 | 2006 | |||
| 10.7591/9781501721731 | 2002 | |||
| 10.7591/9781501733901 | 1996 |
Citations
Citations Analysis
The category
Political science 24
is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled States and democracy and was published in 2014. The most recent citation comes from a 2024 study titled It’s the state, indeed! How state capacity facilitates social equality in authoritarian regimes. This article reached its peak citation in 2017, with 10 citations. It has been cited in 18 different journals, 16% of which are open access. Among related journals, the International Political Science Review cited this research the most, with 8 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.