Defining social movements by their rhetorical form

Article Properties
Cite
Cathcart, Robert S. “Defining Social Movements by Their Rhetorical Form”. Central States Speech Journal, vol. 31, no. 4, 1980, pp. 267-73, https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978009368066.
Cathcart, R. S. (1980). Defining social movements by their rhetorical form. Central States Speech Journal, 31(4), 267-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978009368066
Cathcart, Robert S. “Defining Social Movements by Their Rhetorical Form”. Central States Speech Journal 31, no. 4 (1980): 267-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978009368066.
1.
Cathcart RS. Defining social movements by their rhetorical form. Central States Speech Journal. 1980;31(4):267-73.
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Faith and reason: An analysis of the homologies of Black and Blue Lives Facebook pages

New Media & Society
  • Social Sciences
  • Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media
14 2017
Disputatious Rhetoric and Political Change: The Case of the Greek Anti-Mining Movement

Political Studies
  • Political science: Political institutions and public administration (General)
  • Political science
  • Social Sciences
9 2016
Counter-Public Enclaves and Understanding the Function of Rhetoric in Social Movement Coalition-Building Communication Quarterly
  • Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media
49 2011
From Environmental Campaigns to Advancing the Public Dialog: Environmental Communication for Civic Engagement Environmental Communication
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media
  • Geography. Anthropology. Recreation: Environmental sciences
  • Social Sciences
139 2010
InvokingPractical Magic: New Social Movements, Hidden Populations, and the Public Screen Western Journal of Communication
  • Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media
4 2006
Citations Analysis
The category Language and Literature: Philology. Linguistics: Communication. Mass media 18 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled Conservative resistance revisited—A reply to Medhurst and was published in 1982. The most recent citation comes from a 2017 study titled Faith and reason: An analysis of the homologies of Black and Blue Lives Facebook pages. This article reached its peak citation in 1990, with 4 citations. It has been cited in 15 different journals. Among related journals, the Communication Studies cited this research the most, with 6 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year