EVIL FOR FREEDOM'S SAKE?

Article Properties
Journal Category
Philosophy
Psychology
Religion
Philosophy (General)
Citations
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Resisting the epistemic argument for compatibilism Philosophical Studies
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
1 2023
God and gratuitous evil: Between the rock and the hard place International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Religions. Mythology. Rationalism
2023
Atheistic modal realism

Religious Studies
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Religions. Mythology. Rationalism
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion
2022
The Global/Local Distinction Vindicates Leibniz’s Theodicy Theology and Science
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General)
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Religions. Mythology. Rationalism
2022
Relocating the Problem of Evil: Analysis and Evaluation of A Current Discussion

Pamukkale Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 2022
Citations Analysis
The category Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Philosophy (General) 14 is the most commonly referenced area in studies that cite this article. The first research to cite this article was titled What God Could Have Made and was published in 2005. The most recent citation comes from a 2023 study titled God and gratuitous evil: Between the rock and the hard place. This article reached its peak citation in 2022, with 5 citations. It has been cited in 15 different journals, 20% of which are open access. Among related journals, the Religious Studies cited this research the most, with 3 citations. The chart below illustrates the annual citation trends for this article.
Citations used this article by year