The effectiveness of groups recognizing patterns

Article Properties
Cite
Hayne, Stephen C., et al. “The Effectiveness of Groups Recognizing Patterns”. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 59, no. 5, 2003, pp. 523-4, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00046-6.
Hayne, S. C., Smith, C., & Turk, D. (2003). The effectiveness of groups recognizing patterns. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(5), 523-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00046-6
Hayne, Stephen C., C.A.P. Smith, and Dan Turk. “The Effectiveness of Groups Recognizing Patterns”. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59, no. 5 (2003): 523-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00046-6.
Hayne SC, Smith C, Turk D. The effectiveness of groups recognizing patterns. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2003;59(5):523-4.
Journal Categories
Medicine
Internal medicine
Neurosciences
Biological psychiatry
Neuropsychiatry
Neurology
Diseases of the nervous system
Psychiatry
Philosophy
Psychology
Religion
Psychology
Science
Mathematics
Instruments and machines
Electronic computers
Computer science
Technology
Electrical engineering
Electronics
Nuclear engineering
Electronics
Technology
Mechanical engineering and machinery
Refrences
Title Journal Journal Categories Citations Publication Date
Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human–computer interaction Human–Computer Interaction
  • Science: Mathematics: Instruments and machines: Electronic computers. Computer science
  • Science: Mathematics: Instruments and machines: Electronic computers. Computer science
  • Science: Mathematics: Instruments and machines: Electronic computers. Computer science: Computer software
  • Technology: Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering: Electronics: Computer engineering. Computer hardware
  • Science: Mathematics: Instruments and machines: Electronic computers. Computer science
2002
Pooling Unshared Information: The Benefits of Knowing How Access to Information Is Distributed among Group Members Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business: Personnel management. Employment management
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology
  • Social Sciences: Industries. Land use. Labor: Management. Industrial management
  • Social Sciences: Commerce: Business
  • Social Sciences: Economic theory. Demography: Economics as a science
153 2000
Measuring Team Knowledge

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology
  • Technology: Technology (General): Industrial engineering. Management engineering: Information technology
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology
  • Technology: Technology (General): Industrial engineering. Management engineering
  • Medicine: Internal medicine: Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry: Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system: Psychiatry
260 2000
Groupware and social networks 1999
Socially Shared Cognition, Affect, and Behavior: A Review and Integration

Personality and Social Psychology Review
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology
  • Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology
  • Medicine: Internal medicine: Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry: Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system: Psychiatry
151 1999
Refrences Analysis
The category Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Psychology 21 is the most frequently represented among the references in this article. It primarily includes studies from Small Group Research and Cognitive Science. The chart below illustrates the number of referenced publications per year.
Refrences used by this article by year